Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 91%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 74.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics128% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
SystemAsus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD  (all builds)
MotherboardASUSTeK K30AD_M31AD_M51AD_M32AD
Memory11 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20140609
Uptime0.4 Days
Run DateMar 19 '19 at 23:56
Run Duration198 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU8%
Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-4790S-$60
SOCKET 1150, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (67th percentile)
74.2% Very good
Memory 88.4
1-Core 105
2-Core 203
76% 132 Pts
4-Core 325
8-Core 517
52% 421 Pts
64-Core 455
28% 455 Pts
Poor: 58%
This bench: 74.2%
Great: 79%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$396
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (74th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
128% Outstanding
Lighting 176
Reflection 167
Parallax 180
143% 174 fps
MRender 187
Gravity 155
Splatting 111
119% 151 fps
Poor: 109%
This bench: 128%
Great: 134%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$50
1TB free (System drive)
Firmware: MX4OABS0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 130 122 133 130 140 MB/s
Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
75.8% Very good
Read 133
Write 114
Mixed 27
SusWrite 131
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2
4K Mixed 0.5
126% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 49%
This bench: 75.8%
Great: 108%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
828GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 177 178 178 178 176 178 MB/s
Performing above expectations (85th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 174
Write 165
Mixed 88.3
SusWrite 178
111% 151 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 3
4K Mixed 1.1
224% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 101%
Great: 109%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
913GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 196 198 198 199 196 197 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
114% Outstanding
Read 198
Write 193
Mixed 97.2
SusWrite 197
125% 171 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.3
248% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 114%
Great: 109%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
684GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
12.5% Very poor
Read 35.5
Write 36.3
Mixed 23
SusWrite 13.5
35% 27.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.6
70% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 12.5%
Great: 44%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 2TB
917GB free, PID 0200
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 5.6 11 12 13 13 20 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
11.8% Very poor
Read 34.8
Write 37.3
Mixed 20.2
SusWrite 12.3
34% 26.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.5
63% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.8%
Great: 44%
WD My Passport 0827 1TB
931GB free, PID 0827
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 14 13 13 13 13 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
10.7% Very poor
Read 39.5
Write 38.2
Mixed 18.7
SusWrite 13.6
35% 27.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 0.6
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 10.7%
Great: 45%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial BLT8G3D1608DT2TXOB 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (50th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
50.6% Above average
MC Read 17.6
MC Write 18.4
MC Mixed 15.8
49% 17.3 GB/s
SC Read 12.8
SC Write 17.9
SC Mixed 15.6
44% 15.4 GB/s
Latency 69.2
58% 69.2 ns
Poor: 34%
This bench: 50.6%
Great: 74%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical K30AD_M31AD_M51AD Builds (Compare 2,167 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 26%
Raft
Desktop
Desktop 78%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 22%
Surfboard

System: Asus K30AD_M31AD_M51AD

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 71% - Very good Total price: $324
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback