Asus P8P67-M PRO

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (80th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 20 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	64.6% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8P67-M PRO (all builds)
Memory	5.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121130
Uptime	0.4 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '19 at 22:46
Run Duration	168 Seconds
Run User	DEU-User
Background CPU	17%

PC Performing above expectations (80^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Xeon E31230 2,472 User benchmarks, average bench 69% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	71.7% Very good	Memory 90.5 1-Core 90 2-Core 167 70% 116 Pts	4-Core 287 8-Core 435 45% 361 Pts	64-Core 443 27% 443 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 71.7% Great: 75%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD R9 Fury-$199 18,014 User benchmarks, average bench 58% Sapphire(174B E331) CLim: 1050 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 19.3.2 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	64.6% Good	Lighting 82.8 Reflection 58.2 Parallax 106 68% 82.4 fps	MRender 58.3 Gravity 81.9 Splatting 74.3 59% 71.5 fps
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 64.6% Great: 62%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 830 128GB-$109 37,250 User benchmarks, average bench 63% 60GB free (System drive) Firmware: CXM03B1Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 3,934 Write 57.8 Mixed 114 285% 1,368 MB/s	4K Read 452 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 7 696% 154 MB/s
Poor: 48% Great: 76%
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95 217,115 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 46GB free Firmware: EXT0BB6Q Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 478 Write 456 Mixed 360 96% 431 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 56.3 4K Mixed 39.7 130% 42.9 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 353 DQ Mixed 226 209% 321 MB/s
Poor: 64% Great: 118%
Seagate ST2000DM002-1BJ164 2TB 233 User benchmarks, average bench 93% 2TB free Firmware: CS41 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 198 Write 148 Mixed 81.9 105% 142 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.6 4K Mixed 0.8 148% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 66% Great: 114%
USB DISK 2.0 32GB 1,547 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 30GB free, PID 4100 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 16 Write 10.8 Mixed 9.7 14% 12.2 MB/s	4K Read 4.7 4K Write 0.2 4K Mixed 0.8 51% 1.9 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 11%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Value DDR3 1333 C9 2x4GB 4,667 User benchmarks, average bench 48% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz Performing above expectations (67^th percentile)	51% Above average	MC Read 18.2 MC Write 17.9 MC Mixed 15.9 50% 17.3 GB/s	SC Read 14.4 SC Write 16.6 SC Mixed 15.8 44% 15.6 GB/s	Latency 66.6 60% 66.6 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 51% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8P67-M PRO Builds (Compare 387 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 33%

Sail boat

Desktop 74%

Battleship

Workstation 25%

Raft

Motherboard: Asus P8P67-M PRO - $150

CPU
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples	120x
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples	68x
Core i7-2600Intel $195Bench 67%, 185,630 samples	61x

GPU
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	31x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	25x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	20x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	20x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	13x
840 Evo 250GBSamsung $95Bench 96%, 217,115 samples	10x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	10x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	7x
99U5471-012.A00LF 4x4GBKingstonBench 49%, 1,349 samples	6x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 69% - Good

Total price: $554

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $274	Nvidia RTX 4060 $295	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $42	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16