Performance Results


Gaming 87% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 109% UFO


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 69.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	117% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	295% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	64GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 64GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Motherboard	Asrock X399 Taichi (all builds)
Memory	59.1 GB free of 64 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, , Цвета: 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit, Цвета: 1024 x 768 - 32 Bit
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180814
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 19 '19 at 22:40
Run Duration	148 Seconds
Run User	RUS-User
Background CPU	15%

PC Performing as expected (47^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen TR 1950X-$225 23,641 User benchmarks, average bench 77% SP3r2, 1 CPU, 16 cores, 32 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg) Performing way below expectations (9^th percentile)	69.5% Good	Memory 61.2 1-Core 113 2-Core 227 72% 134 Pts	4-Core 417 8-Core 690 68% 554 Pts	64-Core 2,366 146% 2,366 Pts
Poor: 68% ↑ This bench: 69.5% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 374C) ≥ 4GB CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 2752 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (19^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	117% Outstanding	Lighting 157 Reflection 171 Parallax 189 128% 172 fps	MRender 115 Gravity 163 Splatting 114 106% 131 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 117% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TB-$158 331,647 User benchmarks, average bench 297% 637GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B2Q Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1176 2185 1432 1150 1153 1126 MB/s Performing as expected (47^th percentile)	295% Outstanding	Read 2,404 Write 2,182 Mixed 1,448 SusWrite 1,370 414% 1,851 MB/s	4K Read 55.7 4K Write 145 4K Mixed 77.2 260% 92.7 MB/s	DQ Read 736 DQ Write 803 DQ Mixed 682 537% 740 MB/s
Poor: 214% ↑ This bench: 295% Great: 372%
WD Green 2TB (2011)-$70 212,471 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 718GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 56 51 52 58 58 60 MB/s Performing way below expectations (14^th percentile)	36.8% Below average	Read 72.2 Write 66.7 Mixed 66 SusWrite 55.7 48% 65.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 0.4 96% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 36.8% Great: 67%
WD Se 2TB (2013)-$39 2,177 User benchmarks, average bench 75% 2TB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 157 158 160 160 160 159 MB/s Performing way above expectations (98^th percentile)	94.2% Outstanding	Read 169 Write 151 Mixed 92 SusWrite 159 105% 143 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 3.3 4K Mixed 1.1 229% 1.83 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 94.2% Great: 93%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL F4 DDR4 3000 C16 4x16GB 1,166 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 8 slots used 64GB DIMM DDR4 2134 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	126% Outstanding	MC Read 46.9 MC Write 53.2 MC Mixed 49.5 142% 49.9 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 31.6 SC Mixed 22.5 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 124 32% 124 ns
Poor: 67% ↑ This bench: 126% Great: 118%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 99%

Nuclear submarine

Desktop 86%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 120%

UFO

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	38x
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $158Bench 297%, 331,647 samples	28x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	19x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	13x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 2x16GBG.SKILLBench 89%, 92,468 samples	12x
Ripjaws V DDR4 3200 C16 4x16GBG.SKILL $143Bench 95%, 14,506 samples	11x

Value: 80% - Excellent

Total price: $918

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16