Sony VGN-NS225J

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 2%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 25%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 2%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (25th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 75 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 25.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics0.43% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive29.1% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (100%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
SystemSony VGN-NS225J  (all builds)
MotherboardSony VAIO
Memory1 GB free of 4 GB
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores, 1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colores
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20080918
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 19 '19 at 15:29
Run Duration162 Seconds
Run User PER-User
Background CPU 100%

 PC Performing below expectations (25th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Pentium T4200-$99
N/A, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 2 GHz, turbo 1.85 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (13th percentile)
25.5% Poor
Memory 45.8
1-Core 18.4
2-Core 20.8
22% 28.3 Pts
4-Core 30.8
8-Core 39
4% 34.9 Pts
64-Core 32.1
2% 32.1 Pts
Poor: 18%
This bench: 25.5%
Great: 41%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Intel Mobile Series 4 Express Chipset Family
Sony(104D 9045)
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 8.15.10.2702
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
0.43% Terrible
Lighting 0.53
Reflection 0.46
Parallax 0.5
0% 0.5 fps
MRender 0.43
Gravity 0.37
Splatting 0.65
0% 0.48 fps
Poor: 0%
This bench: 0.43%
Great: 1%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow KC300 180GB-$122
124GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 507ABBF0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 150 146 143 133 125 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
29.1% Poor
Read 147
Write 187
Mixed 160
SusWrite 138
36% 158 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 14
4K Mixed 11.6
32% 10.7 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 92.5
DQ Mixed 97.7
74% 101 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 29.1%
Great: 85%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 2x2GB
2 of 2 slots used
4GB SODIMM DDR2
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
11.3% Very poor
MC Read 4.4
MC Write 3.5
MC Mixed 3.5
11% 3.8 GB/s
SC Read 1.9
SC Write 2.1
SC Mixed 2.9
7% 2.3 GB/s
Latency 177
23% 177 ns
Poor: 10%
This bench: 11.3%
Great: 44%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback