PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (52nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 48 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 83.6% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H (all builds) |
Memory | 11.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit cores |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20130227 |
Uptime | 0.2 Days |
Run Date | Mar 19 '19 at 14:52 |
Run Duration | 166 Seconds |
Run User | BRA-User |
Background CPU | 5% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3330
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3330 CPU @ 3.00GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg)
|
72.6%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 960-$198
CLim: 1493 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.98
|
36.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$95
77GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0BB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 372 219 102 76 74 70 MB/s
|
83.6%
Excellent
|
|||
WD WD25 00JS-58NCB1 250GB
31GB free
Firmware: 10.02E04
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 34 34 34 34 34 MB/s
|
19.5%
Very poor
|
|||
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$35
225GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 140 141 141 141 142 MB/s
|
80.8%
Excellent
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
282GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 97 97 98 98 91 97 MB/s
|
49.5%
Average
|
|||
SanDisk Cruzer Blade 16GB
12GB free, PID 5567
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
|
||||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 870x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 596x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 355x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 375x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 252x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 182x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $405 |