Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 40%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Boot Drive	54% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (34%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (37^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD A6-3620 APU 2,758 User benchmarks, average bench 41% P0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 2.2 GHz, turbo 2.25 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (51^st percentile)	40% Average	Memory 64.2 1-Core 32.5 2-Core 69 37% 55.2 Pts	4-Core 90.8 8-Core 114 13% 102 Pts	64-Core 125 8% 125 Pts
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 40% Great: 47%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
TEAML5Lite3D240G 240GB 6,836 User benchmarks, average bench 96% 138GB free (System drive) Firmware: Q0410A SusWrite @10s intervals: 160 187 180 144 145 144 MB/s Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	54% Above average	Read 231 Write 217 Mixed 215 SusWrite 160 46% 206 MB/s	4K Read 20.2 4K Write 44.4 4K Mixed 26.6 88% 30.4 MB/s	DQ Read 176 DQ Write 159 DQ Mixed 104 95% 146 MB/s
Poor: 49% ↑ This bench: 54% Great: 123%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 797GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 167 166 173 175 175 MB/s Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	99.8% Outstanding	Read 180 Write 169 Mixed 84.3 SusWrite 168 110% 150 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1.1 225% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 99.8% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M378B5273CH0-CH9 2x4GB 5,657 User benchmarks, average bench 47% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz Performing below potential (9^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	31.3% Below average	MC Read 12.8 MC Write 11.3 MC Mixed 10.3 33% 11.5 GB/s	SC Read 5.3 SC Write 5.3 SC Mixed 7.9 18% 6.17 GB/s	Latency 116 34% 116 ns
Poor: 27% ↑ This bench: 31.3% Great: 53%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 6%

Tree trunk

Desktop 40%

Jet ski

Workstation 6%

Tree trunk

SSD
CS900 250GB SSDPNYBench 75%, 2,686 samples	1x
PLUS 480GBSandiskBench 48%, 58,990 samples	1x
WDS100T2B0A-00SM50 1TBWDCBench 98%, 74,123 samples	1x

RAM
HMT351U6BFR8C-H9 2x4GBHynixBench 46%, 5,138 samples	1x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	1x
ACR16D3LU1KFG/4G 2x4GBKingstonBench 51%, 2,425 samples	1x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16