| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 56.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 35.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | 30.3% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
| Motherboard | Asrock N68C-GS FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20121031 |
| Uptime | 6.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 19 '19 at 00:08 |
| Run Duration | 130 Seconds |
| Run User | ESP-User |
| Background CPU | 0% |
PC Performing below expectations (32nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
56.7%
Above average
|
52% 87.4 Pts
|
40% 333 Pts
|
8% 137 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1949 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35
|
35.1%
Below average
|
37% 37.6 fps
|
31% 38.6 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston A400 240GB-$28
169GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R010
SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 210 176 96 72 84 MB/s
|
30.3%
Below average
|
33% 151 MB/s
|
45% 12.1 MB/s
|
6% 14.3 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 1TB-$33
719GB free
Firmware: CC46
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 173 178 176 178 177 MB/s
|
80.3%
Excellent
|
92% 126 MB/s
|
144% 0.93 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Kingston HyperX DDR3 1600 C10 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 333 MHz
|
21.3%
Poor
|
20% 6.93 GB/s
|
17% 5.87 GB/s
|
38% 105 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical N68C-GS FX Builds (Compare 153 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock N68C-GS FX
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 21x |
| FX-4300AMD $73Bench 52%, 55,454 samples | 17x |
| FX-4100AMD $110Bench 51%, 32,471 samples | 11x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GeForce 210NvidiaBench 1%, 98,254 samples | 9x |
| GeForce 7025 / nForce 630aNvidiaBench 0%, 5,527 samples | 8x |
| R7 240AMDBench 5%, 58,337 samples | 7x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $75 |