Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF

Performance Results


Gaming 57% Gunboat	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 44% Speed boat


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	72.9% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	78.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (56%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF (all builds)
Memory	9.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit kolorów
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160307
Uptime	1 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '19 at 17:36
Run Duration	127 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	56%

Watch Gameplay: 1070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (27^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-6600K-$81 342,244 User benchmarks, average bench 72% U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	72.3% Very good	Memory 81.3 1-Core 77.6 2-Core 200 67% 119 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 325 48% 350 Pts	64-Core 394 24% 394 Pts
Poor: 57% ↑ This bench: 72.3% Great: 85%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 3701) CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (12^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	72.9% Very good	Lighting 92.4 Reflection 96.9 Parallax 75.3 75% 88.2 fps	MRender 85.2 Gravity 84.4 Splatting 81.7 68% 83.8 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 72.9% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 24GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 300 155 142 129 116 114 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	78.2% Very good	Read 350 Write 347 Mixed 306 SusWrite 159 65% 291 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 64.1 4K Mixed 37.7 124% 43.1 MB/s	DQ Read 375 DQ Write 336 DQ Mixed 356 267% 356 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 78.2% Great: 124%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 174GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 127 127 126 126 127 MB/s Performing below expectations (33^rd percentile)	75.9% Very good	Read 138 Write 135 Mixed 92.5 SusWrite 126 91% 123 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.6 4K Mixed 1.2 227% 1.63 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 75.9% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 2133 C14 4x4GB 11,542 User benchmarks, average bench 76% 4 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (33^rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	71.5% Very good	MC Read 24.9 MC Write 28.6 MC Mixed 24.9 75% 26.1 GB/s	SC Read 14.6 SC Write 22.5 SC Mixed 18.2 53% 18.4 GB/s	Latency 78.2 51% 78.2 ns
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 71.5% Great: 99%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-H170M-D3H-CF Builds (Compare 730 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 41%

Speed boat

Desktop 75%

Battleship

Workstation 33%

Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H170M-D3H-CF

CPU
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples	169x
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples	168x
Core i7-6700KIntel $180Bench 81%, 588,978 samples	74x

GPU
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	75x
GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples	55x
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples	47x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples	31x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	22x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	15x

RAM
Fury DDR4 2133 C14 2x8GBHyperX $125Bench 73%, 59,072 samples	27x
HyperX 2133 C14 2x8GBKingstonBench 68%, 49,673 samples	22x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	16x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 66% - Good

Total price: $408

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16