Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results


Gaming 85% Aircraft carrier	Desktop 75% Battleship	Workstation 84% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	118% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	91.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds)
Memory	26.8 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180501
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 18 '19 at 03:34
Run Duration	237 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	11%

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Ryzen 7 1700-$195 144,475 User benchmarks, average bench 69% AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	70.5% Very good	Memory 68.7 1-Core 98.3 2-Core 196 67% 121 Pts	4-Core 387 8-Core 719 66% 553 Pts	64-Core 1,046 65% 1,046 Pts
Poor: 59% ↑ This bench: 70.5% Great: 81%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485 840,268 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Gigabyte(1458 3751) CLim: 2037 MHz, MLim: 2485 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	118% Outstanding	Lighting 158 Reflection 186 Parallax 168 129% 171 fps	MRender 117 Gravity 169 Splatting 116 108% 134 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 118% Great: 133%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$130 154,399 User benchmarks, average bench 110% 271GB free (System drive) Firmware: EMT03B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 216 100 82 85 90 78 MB/s Performing way below expectations (13^th percentile)	91.4% Outstanding	Read 477 Write 437 Mixed 372 SusWrite 108 78% 349 MB/s	4K Read 33.1 4K Write 92.4 4K Mixed 49.5 162% 58.3 MB/s	DQ Read 327 DQ Write 341 DQ Mixed 344 256% 337 MB/s
Poor: 80% ↑ This bench: 91.4% Great: 133%
WD WD10EACS-00ZJB0 1TB 28,352 User benchmarks, average bench 39% 86GB free Firmware: 01.01A01 SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 56 54 53 54 55 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	28.1% Poor	Read 43 Write 32 Mixed 36.8 SusWrite 54.6 31% 41.6 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.9 152% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 28.1% Great: 51%
Seagate Expansion Desk 8TB 11,959 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 2TB free Firmware: 9401 SusWrite @10s intervals: 165 158 165 167 166 169 MB/s Performing above expectations (70^th percentile)	77.8% Very good	Read 105 Write 105 Mixed 79.2 SusWrite 165 84% 114 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 0.6 176% 1.97 MB/s
Poor: 15% ↑ This bench: 77.8% Great: 94%
WD Blue 750GB (2008)-$72 4,659 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 232GB free Firmware: 30.04G30 SusWrite @10s intervals: 64 66 67 66 66 67 MB/s Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	44.9% Average	Read 90 Write 83 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 66.1 55% 74.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1 182% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 44.9% Great: 52%
WD Green 2.5TB (2011)-$80 1,241 User benchmarks, average bench 54% 155GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 51 52 51 51 51 51 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	38.9% Below average	Read 83.7 Write 85.2 Mixed 62.3 SusWrite 51.4 52% 70.7 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 144% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 34% ↑ This bench: 38.9% Great: 72%
WD Green 4TB (2013)-$136 31,988 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 188GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 87 85 87 87 85 MB/s Performing way below expectations (15^th percentile)	50.3% Above average	Read 90.2 Write 81.5 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 85 58% 79.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.9 162% 1.13 MB/s
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 50.3% Great: 87%
WD Black 1TB (2010)-$49 257,835 User benchmarks, average bench 57% 240GB free Firmware: 05.00K05 SusWrite @10s intervals: 63 64 63 62 64 63 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	47.1% Average	Read 100 Write 93.2 Mixed 75.2 SusWrite 63.2 62% 83 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 2.4 4K Mixed 1 185% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 35% ↑ This bench: 47.1% Great: 76%
TO Exter nal USB 3.0 1TB 3,447 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 931GB free Firmware: 0203 SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 105 105 105 105 106 MB/s Performing above expectations (81^st percentile)	61.3% Good	Read 108 Write 103 Mixed 60.5 SusWrite 106 69% 94.2 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 2 4K Mixed 0.7 136% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 16% ↑ This bench: 61.3% Great: 81%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 436GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 118 118 114 121 116 MB/s Performing as expected (49^th percentile)	66.2% Good	Read 175 Write 183 Mixed 121 SusWrite 118 199% 149 MB/s	4K Read 1.9 4K Write 4.8 4K Mixed 1.2 211% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 66.2% Great: 86%
WD easystore 25FB 8TB 7,734 User benchmarks, average bench 62% 872GB free, PID 25fb Operating at USB 3.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 137 133 130 136 137 137 MB/s Performing as expected (45^th percentile)	64.5% Good	Read 135 Write 140 Mixed 95.7 SusWrite 135 172% 127 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 4.9 4K Mixed 1.2 214% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 22% ↑ This bench: 64.5% Great: 86%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Corsair CMR16GX4M2C3000C15 4x8GB 4,486 User benchmarks, average bench 89% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (16^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	70.8% Very good	MC Read 27.4 MC Write 23.6 MC Mixed 24.8 72% 25.3 GB/s	SC Read 18.7 SC Write 28 SC Mixed 22.8 66% 23.2 GB/s	Latency 104 38% 104 ns
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 70.8% Great: 106%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 90%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 80%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 87%

Aircraft carrier

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

CPU
Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples	100x
Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples	88x
Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples	75x

GPU
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	70x
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	52x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	49x

SSD
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $95Bench 310%, 455,997 samples	27x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	23x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	17x

RAM
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBCorsair $40Bench 85%, 653,654 samples	37x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GBCorsair $43Bench 82%, 606,405 samples	23x
Flare X DDR4 3200 C14 2x8GBG.SKILL $73Bench 98%, 54,616 samples	13x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 76% - Very good

Total price: $1,061

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16

Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5

Performance Results

Run History

PC Performing below expectations (38th percentile)

System Memory Latency Ladder

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246

Feedback

PC Performing below expectations (38^th percentile)