Fujitsu AMILO Li1705

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way below expectations (11th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 89 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 13.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is terrible.
Boot Drive28.7% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
MemoryThe RAM on this system should be upgraded to at least 2GB although on 32bit systems 1GB will suffice as a bare minimum.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Sub-optimal background CPU (17%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemFujitsu AMILO Li1705  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU AMILO Li1705
Memory0.5 GB free of 1.5 GB @ 0.5 GHz
Display1280 x 800 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20070102
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 17 '19 at 12:14
Run Duration127 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 17%

 PC Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel T2080-$150
mPGA 479M, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 1.75 GHz
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
13.5% Very poor
Memory 21.9
1-Core 16.5
2-Core 31.7
15% 23.4 Pts
4-Core 29.4
8-Core 33.5
4% 31.5 Pts
64-Core 31.8
2% 31.8 Pts
Poor: 21%
This bench: 13.5%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
VIA Chrome9 HC IGP WDDM 1.1
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 10F7) 256MB
Driver: VTGUModeDX32.dll Ver. 8.14.14.87
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
Lighting 0.03
Reflection 0.12
0% 0.07 fps
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Intel 320 Series 120GB-$89
91GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 4PC10302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 83 77 69 106 105 105 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
28.7% Poor
Read 120
Write 105
Mixed 95.8
SusWrite 90.6
23% 103 MB/s
4K Read 13.7
4K Write 23.9
4K Mixed 16.7
55% 18.1 MB/s
DQ Read 18.7
DQ Write 35
DQ Mixed 17.1
16% 23.6 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 28.7%
Great: 48%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Unknown 1GB
null MHz
512, 1024 MB
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
6.58% Terrible
MC Read 3
MC Write 2.3
MC Mixed 1.1
6% 2.13 GB/s
SC Read 2
SC Write 2.5
SC Mixed 0.5
5% 1.67 GB/s
Latency 307
13% 307 ns
Poor: 5%
This bench: 6.58%
Great: 43%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback