User System

Performance Results


Gaming 1% Tree trunk	Desktop 17% Surfboard	Workstation 1% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (32nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 68 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 34.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	2.23% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory	2GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows however a minimum of 4GB is recommended for gaming or any other RAM intensive tasks such as photo/video editing. This system will also be a little more responsive with 4GB of RAM.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (36%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	eveshamvale
Motherboard	eveshamvale 946 7MA Series
Memory	0.2 GB free of 2 GB @ 0 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20061106
Uptime	1.5 Days
Run Date	Mar 17 '19 at 07:09
Run Duration	264 Seconds
Run User	GBR-User
Background CPU	36%

PC Performing below expectations (32^nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core2 6400 5,556 User benchmarks, average bench 35% Socket 775, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 2.15 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (35^th percentile)	34.4% Below average	Memory 64.4 1-Core 11.5 2-Core 22.9 27% 32.9 Pts	4-Core 27.6 8-Core 42.2 4% 34.9 Pts	64-Core 37.3 2% 37.3 Pts
Poor: 24% ↑ This bench: 34.4% Great: 41%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 6450 32,407 User benchmarks, average bench 2% Sapphire(174B E164) 1GB Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	2.23% Terrible	Lighting 3.2 Reflection 2.31 Parallax 1.97 3% 2.49 fps	MRender 1.81 Gravity 1.57 Splatting 2 2% 1.79 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.23% Great: 2%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
WD Blue 3D 250GB-$31 23,658 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 50GB free Firmware: X61130WD SusWrite @10s intervals: 203 206 198 204 199 197 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	46.1% Average	Read 202 Write 199 Mixed 113 SusWrite 201 40% 179 MB/s	4K Read 18.8 4K Write 33.4 4K Mixed 22.1 74% 24.8 MB/s	DQ Read 32 DQ Write 80.2 DQ Mixed 42.2 36% 51.5 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 46.1% Great: 105%
WD WD3200JS-63PDB1 320GB 3,111 User benchmarks, average bench 28% 91GB free (System drive) Firmware: 21.00M21 SusWrite @10s intervals: 7.7 5.6 11 6 7.4 6.2 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	5.49% Terrible	Read 11.7 Write 11.3 Mixed 13 SusWrite 7.2 8% 10.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 0.7 4K Mixed 0.2 44% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 5.49% Great: 36%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 15,750 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 15GB free, PID 6545 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 3.1 2.8 2.3 2.2 3.7 3.7 MB/s Performing above expectations (71^st percentile)	4.6% Terrible	Read 19.2 Write 15.8 Mixed 11.5 SusWrite 2.9 15% 12.4 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0.1 4K Mixed 0.1 20% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 3% ↑ This bench: 4.6% Great: 6%
WD My Passport 0830 500GB 1,616 User benchmarks, average bench 29% 290GB free, PID 0830 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 1.9 1.6 1.6 1.3 1.3 1.4 MB/s Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	10.6% Very poor	Read 31.9 Write 15.6 Mixed 18.4 SusWrite 1.5 20% 16.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.8 90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 10.6% Great: 45%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 2x1GB 68,489 User benchmarks, average bench 14% 2 of 2 slots used 2GB DIMM DDR Performing below potential (10^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	7.29% Terrible	MC Read 2.5 MC Write 1.9 MC Mixed 1.6 6% 2 GB/s	SC Read 0.6 SC Write 0.1 SC Mixed 0.5 1% 0.4 GB/s	Latency 115 35% 115 ns
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 7.29% Great: 20%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16