Fujitsu ESPRIMO P710

Performance Results


Gaming 7% Tree trunk	Desktop 63% Destroyer	Workstation 7% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Graphics	2.45% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	65.9% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Fujitsu ESPRIMO P710 (all builds)
Motherboard	FUJITSU D3161-A1
Memory	6.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors,
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20121029
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 16 '19 at 19:57
Run Duration	144 Seconds
Run User	POL-User
Background CPU	0%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i3-3220-$79 71,790 User benchmarks, average bench 52% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.3 GHz Performing way above expectations (97^th percentile)	62.1% Good	Memory 84.7 1-Core 91.9 2-Core 183 70% 120 Pts	4-Core 231 8-Core 231 31% 231 Pts	64-Core 231 14% 231 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 62.1% Great: 62%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 620 17,163 User benchmarks, average bench 2% MSI(1462 259D) 1GB CLim: 1026 MHz, MLim: 490 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	2.45% Terrible	Lighting 3.27 Reflection 3.77 Parallax 2.41 3% 3.15 fps	MRender 3.43 Gravity 0.7 Splatting 3.17 2% 2.43 fps
Poor: 2% ↑ This bench: 2.45% Great: 3%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Ssdpr-cl 100-120-G2 120GB 31 User benchmarks, average bench 58% 52GB free (System drive) Firmware: V3.2 SusWrite @10s intervals: 396 398 235 349 371 54 MB/s Performing above expectations (66^th percentile)	65.9% Good	Read 435 Write 381 Mixed 278 SusWrite 301 78% 349 MB/s	4K Read 24.8 4K Write 59.1 4K Mixed 10.4 82% 31.4 MB/s	DQ Read 85 DQ Write 215 DQ Mixed 18 52% 106 MB/s
Poor: 42% ↑ This bench: 65.9% Great: 78%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$8 10,486 User benchmarks, average bench 22% 9GB free, PID 5583 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 11 11 8.1 7.9 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	10.8% Very poor	Read 26 Write 16 Mixed 18.4 SusWrite 10.5 22% 17.7 MB/s	4K Read 4.4 4K Write 1.2 4K Mixed 3.1 162% 2.9 MB/s
Poor: 10% ↑ This bench: 10.8% Great: 31%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 500GB 57 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 94GB free, PID ab05 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 17 20 21 19 MB/s Performing way below expectations (16^th percentile)	10.7% Very poor	Read 27.5 Write 23.6 Mixed 19.8 SusWrite 19 30% 22.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 0.8 4K Mixed 0.6 50% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 10.7% Great: 38%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Nanya M2Y2G64CB8HA5N-CG 4x2GB 24 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 4 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing way above expectations (96^th percentile)	51.7% Above average	MC Read 18.1 MC Write 18.1 MC Mixed 16.5 50% 17.6 GB/s	SC Read 15.5 SC Write 17.1 SC Mixed 17.7 48% 16.8 GB/s	Latency 72.3 55% 72.3 ns
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 51.7% Great: 52%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical ESPRIMO P710 Builds (Compare 636 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 60%

Gunboat

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P710

CPU
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples	229x
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	97x
Core i3-3220Intel $79Bench 52%, 71,790 samples	52x

GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	109x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	85x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	66x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	40x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	24x
CS900 240GBPNY $20Bench 73%, 61,417 samples	10x

RAM
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	17x
M378B5773CH0-CK0 2x2GBSamsungBench 50%, 789 samples	8x
M378B5773CH0-CK0 4x2GBSamsungBench 57%, 306 samples	7x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 72% - Very good

Total price: $87

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16