PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (38th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 62 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 68.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 17.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 74.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP Z1 G3 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | HP 8115 |
Memory | 9.7 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
Display | 3840 x 2160 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20160620 |
Uptime | 4.6 Days |
Run Date | Mar 16 '19 at 15:47 |
Run Duration | 151 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 27% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Xeon E3-1225 v5
CPU0, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
|
68.5%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia Quadro M2000M
HP(103C 1121) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1137 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 391.33
|
17.7%
Very poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
WD Blue 500GB-$84
312GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X41100WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 278 302 295 306 305 304 MB/s
|
74.1%
Very good
|
|||
WD Blue 3D 1TB-$85
915GB free
Firmware: X61190WD
SusWrite @10s intervals: 311 349 356 370 362 359 MB/s
|
73%
Very good
|
|||
WD Elements 25A1 2TB
1TB free, PID 25a1
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 92 94 93 94 92 94 MB/s
|
39.6%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung M474A1G43EB1-CPB 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
64.6%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 10x |
Xeon E3-1225 v5IntelBench 74%, 3,017 samples | 7x |
Xeon E3-1245 v5IntelBench 76%, 2,081 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
Quadro M2000MNvidiaBench 16%, 5,864 samples | 13x |
Quadro M1000MNvidiaBench 13%, 6,377 samples | 6x |
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 82% - Excellent | Total price: $180 |