Fujitsu ESPRIMO P710

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding HDD
Gaming
Gaming 13%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 25%
Surfboard
-
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (43rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 57 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 47.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.19% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive56.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 9 years and 10 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (84%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
SystemFujitsu ESPRIMO P710  (all builds)
MotherboardFUJITSU D3161-A1
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20121029
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 16 '19 at 00:51
Run Duration144 Seconds
Run User POL-User
Background CPU 84%

 PC Performing as expected (43rd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i3-3220-$60
SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing as expected (43rd percentile)
47.4% Average
SC Int 62.5
SC Float 86.4
SC Mixed 79.5
61% 76.1 Pts
QC Int 172
QC Float 217
QC Mixed 223
46% 204 Pts
MC Int 229
MC Float 228
MC Mixed 229
34% 229 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 51%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Intel HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)
Fijitsu Siemens(1734 11D7) 2GB
Driver: igdumd64.dll Ver. 9.17.10.4229
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
4.19% Terrible
Lighting 31.7
Reflection 4.3
Parallax 4.2
7% 13.4 fps
MRender 7.1
Gravity 3
Splatting 7.6
2% 5.9 fps
Poor: 2%
This bench: 4.19%
Great: 2%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Ssdpr-cl 100-120-G2 120GB
51GB free (System drive)
Firmware: V3.2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 140 239 276 257 301 306 MB/s
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
56.8% Above average
Read 423
Write 238
Mixed 208
SusWrite 253
62% 280 MB/s
4K Read 17.7
4K Write 49.1
4K Mixed 8.4
64% 25.1 MB/s
DQ Read 75.6
DQ Write 207
DQ Mixed 18.9
50% 100 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 56.8%
Great: 74%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 16GB-$7
9GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 8.9 8.4 9.3 9.9 11 12 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
9.91% Terrible
Read 24.6
Write 16.3
Mixed 15.8
SusWrite 9.9
21% 16.6 MB/s
4K Read 2.1
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.7
72% 1.33 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 9.91%
Great: 31%
Seagate BUP Slim SL 500GB
94GB free, PID ab05
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 16 17 18 18 18 18 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
9.25% Terrible
Read 19.4
Write 15
Mixed 20.1
SusWrite 17.7
24% 18 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.4
43% 0.57 MB/s
Poor: 11%
This bench: 9.25%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Nanya M2Y2G64CB8HA5N-CG 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
49.5% Average
MC Read 17.4
MC Write 17.4
MC Mixed 15.9
48% 16.9 GB/s
SC Read 14.9
SC Write 16
SC Mixed 16
45% 15.6 GB/s
Latency 75.8
53% 75.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 49.5%
Great: 52%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical ESPRIMO P710 Builds (Compare 472 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard

System: Fujitsu ESPRIMO P710

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 91% - Outstanding Total price: $156
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $356Nvidia GTX 1070 $380Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $92
AMD Ryzen 5 2600 $139Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $208Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $99
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $108Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $163
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $44Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $90SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $43G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $601SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $95SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback