Microelectronics X603

Performance Results


Gaming 102% UFO	Desktop 100% UFO	Workstation 87% Aircraft carrier


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (20th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 80 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	218% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (40%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Microelectronics X603 (all builds)
Motherboard	ASUSTeK ROG STRIX Z390-E GAMING
Memory	18.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 3.2 GHz
Display	3440 x 1440 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20181019
Uptime	0.6 Days
Run Date	Mar 15 '19 at 14:33
Run Duration	262 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	40%

Watch Gameplay: 2080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (20^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-9700K-$252 550,833 User benchmarks, average bench 97% LGA1151, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4.55 GHz (avg) Performing below expectations (34^th percentile)	96.1% Outstanding	Memory 93 1-Core 144 2-Core 286 96% 174 Pts	4-Core 546 8-Core 704 80% 625 Pts	64-Core 819 51% 819 Pts
Poor: 82% ↑ This bench: 96.1% Great: 105%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2080-$407 316,424 User benchmarks, average bench 124% Asus(1043 8665) ≥ 4GB CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.17 Performing below potential (3^rd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 134 Reflection 139 Parallax 131 109% 135 fps	MRender 154 Gravity 118 Splatting 85.9 94% 119 fps
Poor: 109% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 134%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB-$43 381,216 User benchmarks, average bench 273% 341GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 1442 1070 614 602 607 617 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	218% Outstanding	Read 2,145 Write 1,989 Mixed 1,321 SusWrite 825 351% 1,570 MB/s	4K Read 30.2 4K Write 72.1 4K Mixed 37.9 132% 46.7 MB/s	DQ Read 1,010 DQ Write 841 DQ Mixed 782 625% 877 MB/s
Poor: 199% ↑ This bench: 218% Great: 340%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$132 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 1.5TB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 351 361 391 393 409 413 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	97.6% Outstanding	Read 459 Write 397 Mixed 382 SusWrite 386 91% 406 MB/s	4K Read 27.4 4K Write 71.5 4K Mixed 38.5 129% 45.8 MB/s	DQ Read 368 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 289 234% 330 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 97.6% Great: 125%
Samsung 850 PRO 512GB 36 User benchmarks, average bench 113% 109GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 411 318 319 217 79 58 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	70.9% Very good	Read 364 Write 355 Mixed 337 SusWrite 234 72% 322 MB/s	4K Read 20 4K Write 48.6 4K Mixed 26.2 90% 31.6 MB/s	DQ Read 347 DQ Write 295 DQ Mixed 305 233% 316 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 70.9% Great: 136%
Crucial MX500 2TB-$132 44,787 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 2TB free Firmware: M3CR023 SusWrite @10s intervals: 376 272 271 280 241 248 MB/s Performing way below expectations (10^th percentile)	90.8% Outstanding	Read 446 Write 412 Mixed 373 SusWrite 281 85% 378 MB/s	4K Read 27.2 4K Write 68.8 4K Mixed 39.6 128% 45.2 MB/s	DQ Read 370 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 289 233% 329 MB/s
Poor: 83% ↑ This bench: 90.8% Great: 125%
Samsung 850 EVO M.2 1TB 2,597 User benchmarks, average bench 111% 120GB free Firmware: EMT21B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 412 319 310 302 233 169 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	74.8% Very good	Read 363 Write 349 Mixed 300 SusWrite 291 73% 326 MB/s	4K Read 20.9 4K Write 50.8 4K Mixed 26.1 92% 32.6 MB/s	DQ Read 332 DQ Write 302 DQ Mixed 308 234% 314 MB/s
Poor: 84% ↑ This bench: 74.8% Great: 133%
Hitachi HDS723020BLA642 2TB-$249 29,211 User benchmarks, average bench 66% 493GB free Firmware: MN6OA5C0 SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 142 144 144 143 143 MB/s Performing above expectations (61^st percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 105 Write 100 Mixed 65.2 SusWrite 143 76% 103 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 158% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 40% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 85%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113 87,239 User benchmarks, average bench 91% 4 of 4 slots used 32GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 3200 MHz Performing below potential (35^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	86.8% Excellent	MC Read 32.4 MC Write 33.3 MC Mixed 29.2 90% 31.6 GB/s	SC Read 16.6 SC Write 28.8 SC Mixed 21.8 64% 22.4 GB/s	Latency 62.1 64% 62.1 ns
Poor: 64% ↑ This bench: 86.8% Great: 120%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical X603 Builds (Compare 22 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 122%

UFO

Desktop 100%

UFO

Workstation 112%

UFO

System: Microelectronics X603

CPU
Core i7-9700KIntel $252Bench 97%, 550,833 samples	20x
Core i9-9900KFIntel $295Bench 98%, 50,265 samples	2x

GPU
RTX 2080Nvidia $407Bench 124%, 316,424 samples	15x
RTX 2080-TiNvidia $441Bench 156%, 357,946 samples	2x
RX 570AMD $130Bench 45%, 473,685 samples	1x

SSD
970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 273%, 381,216 samples	4x
970 Evo Plus NVMe PCIe M.2 500GBSamsung $43Bench 276%, 367,854 samples	2x
960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 1TBSamsung $150Bench 241%, 38,097 samples	2x

RAM
Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILL $113Bench 91%, 87,239 samples	10x
Trident Z RGB DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GBG.SKILL $55Bench 84%, 215,644 samples	5x
F4 DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GBG.SKILLBench 94%, 2,746 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 91% - Outstanding

Total price: $815

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16