Asrock H110M-ITX/ac

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 34%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (34th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 66 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 22.4%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics27.9% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive21.2% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 3 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (47%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. Find active processes with Windows task manager (CTRL+SHIFT+ESC).
Run History
7 months ago, 7 months ago.
MotherboardAsrock H110M-ITX/ac  (all builds)
Memory4.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20161027
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 15 '19 at 12:57
Run Duration158 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU 47%

 PC Performing below expectations (34th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Pentium G4400-$63
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz
Performing way below expectations (6th percentile)
22.4% Poor
1-Core 34.9
2-Core 179
44% 107 Pts
4-Core 125
8-Core 136
18% 130 Pts
64-Core 182
12% 182 Pts
Poor: 23%
This bench: 22.4%
Great: 36%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-$129
Nvidia(10DE 11C0) 2GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
27.9% Poor
Lighting 106
Reflection 69.8
Parallax 119
28% 98.1 fps
MRender 77.2
Gravity 104
Splatting 77.9
28% 86.5 fps
Poor: 25%
This bench: 27.9%
Great: 29%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
KINGSTON 120GB
18GB free (System drive)
Firmware: SBFK
SusWrite @10s intervals: 98 8.2 47 8.2 31 17 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
21.2% Poor
Read 212
Write 97.3
Mixed 104
SusWrite 34.7
25% 112 MB/s
4K Read 8
4K Write 14.4
4K Mixed 4.3
25% 8.9 MB/s
DQ Read 112
DQ Write 33.8
DQ Mixed 39.8
38% 61.9 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 21.2%
Great: 85%
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$29
22GB free
Firmware: MS2O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 74 103 117 117 114 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (3rd percentile)
33.9% Below average
Read 21.3
Write 51.9
Mixed 20
SusWrite 96.9
34% 47.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.3
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.2
53% 0.5 MB/s
Poor: 42%
This bench: 33.9%
Great: 107%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown GLJF62F-DA---------- 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
47.5% Average
MC Read 13.8
MC Write 21.7
MC Mixed 18.2
51% 17.9 GB/s
SC Read 2.5
SC Write 8.2
SC Mixed 13.5
23% 8.07 GB/s
Latency 88.8
45% 88.8 ns
Poor: 48%
This bench: 47.5%
Great: 64%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical H110M-ITX/ac Builds (Compare 898 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 44%
Speed boat
Desktop
Desktop 61%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 29%
Raft

Motherboard: Asrock H110M-ITX/ac

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 51% - Above average Total price: $443
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $148Nvidia GTX 1660 $210Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $57
Intel Core i5-9600K $240Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $270Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $107
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060 $344Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $190
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $78G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $612SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $83SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $14
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback