Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 97%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 100%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 82%
Aircraft carrier
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 107%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics96.8% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
11 days ago, 11 days ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 15 '19 at 12:13
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Single core Quad core Multi core
Intel Core i7-8700K-$380
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
107% Outstanding
SC Int 139
SC Float 149
SC Mixed 144
115% 144 Pts
QC Int 509
QC Float 537
QC Mixed 508
117% 518 Pts
MC Int 946
MC Float 1,138
MC Mixed 1,065
157% 1,050 Pts
Poor: 92%
This bench: 107%
Great: 124%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$330
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below expectations (34th percentile)
96.8% Outstanding
Lighting 292
Reflection 284
Parallax 297
91% 291 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 283
Splatting 224
101% 236 fps
Poor: 73%
This bench: 96.8%
Great: 109%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$104
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 162 136 119 110 104 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 457
Mixed 379
SusWrite 162
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 55.3
187% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 348
262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 78%
This bench: 104%
Great: 125%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
96GB free
Firmware: CP100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 57 59 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 57.2
Write 23.5
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 57.3
30% 41 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 45%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$40
327GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 132 129 134 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 125
Write 138
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 132
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
77.4% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 21.5
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 24.6
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 57.5
70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 70%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 112%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical TUF Z390-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 107%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 139%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 117%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING - $170

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 139% - Outstanding Total price: $1,148
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i7-8700K $380Nvidia GTX 1070 $330Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $104
AMD Ryzen 5 1600 $120Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB $230Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $105
Intel Core i5-8600K $260Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti $808Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $88
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $105SanDisk Extreme 64GB $43
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $716SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $120SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $12
Today's hottest deals
User Guide  •  About  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback