Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 74%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 67%
Battle cruiser
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (35th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 65 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 90.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is outstanding.
Graphics75.7% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive104% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
Run History
6 months ago, 6 months ago.
MotherboardAsus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING  (all builds)
Memory4.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20190118
Uptime0.3 Days
Run DateMar 15 '19 at 12:13
Run Duration137 Seconds
Run User LTU-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing below expectations (35th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core i7-8700K-$350
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 4.35 GHz (avg)
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
90.7% Outstanding
1-Core 144
2-Core 271
98% 207 Pts
4-Core 508
8-Core 838
85% 673 Pts
64-Core 1,065
72% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 90.7%
Great: 108%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$409
Nvidia(10DE 1B81) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
75.7% Very good
Lighting 292
Reflection 284
Parallax 297
76% 291 fps
MRender 201
Gravity 283
Splatting 224
76% 236 fps
Poor: 70%
This bench: 75.7%
Great: 86%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$70
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 345 162 136 119 110 104 MB/s
Performing below expectations (39th percentile)
104% Outstanding
Read 495
Write 457
Mixed 379
SusWrite 162
84% 374 MB/s
4K Read 45
4K Write 91.1
4K Mixed 55.3
187% 63.8 MB/s
DQ Read 374
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 348
262% 352 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 104%
Great: 125%
Samsung HD321KJ 320GB-$42
96GB free
Firmware: CP100-10
SusWrite @10s intervals: 57 58 57 57 59 57 MB/s
Performing as expected (46th percentile)
32.9% Below average
Read 57.2
Write 23.5
Mixed 25.9
SusWrite 57.3
30% 41 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 21%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 44%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
327GB free
Firmware: 15.01H15
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 133 132 129 134 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
74.1% Very good
Read 125
Write 138
Mixed 75.2
SusWrite 132
86% 118 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.1
215% 1.53 MB/s
Poor: 55%
This bench: 74.1%
Great: 110%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3200 C16 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled
77.4% Very good
MC Read 30.3
MC Write 28.7
MC Mixed 21.5
77% 26.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 30
SC Mixed 24.6
70% 24.6 GB/s
Latency 57.5
70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 55%
This bench: 77.4%
Great: 114%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical TUF Z390-PRO GAMING Builds (Compare 1,553 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 114%
UFO
Desktop
Desktop 135%
UFO
Workstation
Workstation 110%
UFO

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z390-PRO GAMING - $162

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 63% - Good Total price: $1,322
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $140Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $70
Intel Core i5-9600K $225Nvidia GTX 1660-Ti $275Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $80
Intel Core i7-9700K $350Nvidia RTX 2060S (Super) $429Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $230
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 64GB $88
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $799SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $64Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $73SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback