| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way above expectations (92nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 8 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master! |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 3.56% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Memory | 4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asus H110M-E/M.2 (all builds) |
| Memory | 2 GB free of 4 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colores |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160919 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 15 '19 at 00:44 |
| Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
| Run User | MEX-User |
| Background CPU | 6% |
PC Performing way above expectations (92nd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
62.5%
Good
|
78% 136 Pts
|
28% 210 Pts
|
13% 210 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Intel HD 510 (Desktop Skylake)
Asus(1043 8694) 1GB
Driver: igdumdim32.dll Ver. 21.20.16.4508
|
3.56%
Terrible
|
3% 3.91 fps
|
5% 5.85 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
8% 9.7 MB/s
|
23% 0.2 MB/s
| ||
|
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB
5GB free, PID 1665
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
|
16% 14.4 MB/s
|
30% 2.7 MB/s
| ||
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Adata 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
|
39.7%
Below average
|
37% 13.1 GB/s
|
35% 12.2 GB/s
|
58% 68.7 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical H110M-E/M.2 Builds (Compare 1,409 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asus H110M-E/M.2
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Core i5-7400Intel $110Bench 64%, 234,266 samples | 211x |
| Core i7-7700Intel $167Bench 76%, 256,717 samples | 186x |
| Core i3-7100Intel $70Bench 57%, 79,299 samples | 167x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 176x |
| HD 630 (Desktop Kaby Lake)IntelBench 5%, 153,031 samples | 167x |
| GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples | 108x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 84% - Excellent | Total price: $197 |