Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 94.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Boot Drive41.3% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (30%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF Z270 MARK 2  (all builds)
Memory12.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20170723
Uptime1.9 Days
Run DateMar 14 '19 at 23:41
Run Duration160 Seconds
Run User FRA-User
Background CPU 30%

 PC Performing below expectations (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700K-$242
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.2 GHz, turbo 4.5 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
94.5% Outstanding
Memory 94.2
1-Core 143
2-Core 288
96% 175 Pts
4-Core 510
8-Core 799
81% 654 Pts
64-Core 797
49% 797 Pts
Poor: 71%
This bench: 94.5%
Great: 92%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance n/a - atypical extreme
Poor: 43% Great: 54%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Kingston A400 120GB-$32
53GB free (System drive)
Firmware: R0105A
SusWrite @10s intervals: 263 190 126 70 72 53 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
41.3% Average
Read 508
Write 252
Mixed 27.3
SusWrite 129
50% 229 MB/s
4K Read 28.7
4K Write 7.6
4K Mixed 1.1
49% 12.5 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 41.3%
Great: 85%
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
131GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 96 98 98 100 98 98 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (14th percentile)
71.4% Very good
Read 151
Write 114
Mixed 75.8
SusWrite 97.9
81% 110 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 71.4%
Great: 114%
Hitachi HUA723020ALA640 2TB-$37
1.5TB free
Firmware: MK7ONS01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 130 131 133 131 133 131 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
58.2% Above average
Read 71.2
Write 73.8
Mixed 49.8
SusWrite 131
60% 81.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.8
154% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 58.2%
Great: 83%
WD My Book 1230 4TB
17GB free, PID 1230
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 67 68 68 67 67 68 MB/s
Performing below expectations (23rd percentile)
29.9% Poor
Read 69
Write 68.7
Mixed 59.3
SusWrite 67.6
90% 66.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
85% 1.1 MB/s
Poor: 14%
This bench: 29.9%
Great: 60%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston KHX2400C15D4/4G Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 KHX2400C15D4/4G Crucial BLS4G4D240FSC.8FBD2 16GB
2400, 2400, 2400, 2400 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
83.2% Excellent
MC Read 30.4
MC Write 31.6
MC Mixed 26
84% 29.3 GB/s
SC Read 17.4
SC Write 32.6
SC Mixed 25.6
72% 25.2 GB/s
Latency 59.3
68% 59.3 ns
Poor: 82%
This bench: 83.2%
Great: 85%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF Z270 MARK 2 Builds (Compare 1,896 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 71%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 90%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 61%
Destroyer

Motherboard: Asus TUF Z270 MARK 2 - $129

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 94% - Outstanding Total price: $656
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback