TEST
YOUR PC
ADD TO PC
BUILD

Dell OptiPlex 9010

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
Save results Copy results User guide
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing way above expectations (95th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 5 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. This PC is likely operated by a technical master!
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 72.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics57% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory14GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 14GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
SystemDell OptiPlex 9010
MotherboardDell OptiPlex 9010  (all builds)
Memory11.4 GB free of 14 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display1024 x 768 - 32 Bit colors, 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20180222
Uptime1.5 Days
Run DateMar 14 '19 at 21:39
Run Duration199 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing way above expectations (95th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i5-3570
CPU 1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
72.7% Very good
Memory 83.7
1-Core 99.9
2-Core 199
73% 128 Pts
4-Core 362
8-Core 338
47% 350 Pts
64-Core 355
22% 355 Pts
Poor: 50% ↑
This bench: 72.7%
 Great: 75%
Graphics Cards Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Asus(1043 8572) 2GB
CLim: 1113 MHz, MLim: 566 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 399.24
Relative performance n/a - benchmarks incomplete
Lighting 5.57
Reflection 5.15
Parallax 5.19
4% 5.3 fps
Gravity 4.53
Splatting 7.22
5% 5.88 fps
Poor: 3% Great: 4%
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$119
EVGA(3842 6160)
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 399.24
Performing below potential (98th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (70 fps cap detected)
57% Above average
Lighting 70.3
Reflection 70.2
Parallax 62.2
57% 67.5 fps
MRender 71.8
Gravity 65.5
Splatting 69.6
56% 69 fps
Poor: 48% ↑
This bench: 57%
 Great: 56%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
PNY CS1311 480GB-$31
70GB free (System drive)
Firmware: CS13
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 492
Write 456
Mixed 322
94% 423 MB/s
4K Read 6.4
4K Write 18.5
4K Mixed 5.1
26% 10 MB/s
DQ Read 78
DQ Write 35.7
DQ Mixed 21.4
25% 45 MB/s
Poor: 58% Great: 101%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
34GB free
Firmware: EMT0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
Read 258
Write 244
Mixed 239
55% 247 MB/s
4K Read 35.2
4K Write 73.5
4K Mixed 45.1
150% 51.3 MB/s
DQ Read 204
DQ Write 183
DQ Mixed 192
145% 193 MB/s
Poor: 72% Great: 124%
WD Blue 500GB (2010)-$35
148GB free
Firmware: 18.0
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 94.3
Write 90.8
Mixed 62.3
61% 82.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
157% 1.2 MB/s
Poor: 24% Great: 69%
Seagate Expansion Desk 4TB
2.5TB free, PID 331a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 31.5
Write 25.5
Mixed 15
29% 24 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 0.5
4K Mixed 0.4
33% 0.53 MB/s
Poor: 14% Great: 73%
Seagate BUP BK 4TB
755GB free, PID ab28
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 34
Write 83.5
Mixed 62.8
86% 60.1 MB/s
4K Read 2.2
4K Write 5.1
4K Mixed 0.6
202% 2.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 57%
Seagate Expansion 4TB
255GB free, PID 231a
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete
Read 23.5
Write 24.3
Mixed 25.3
32% 24.4 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.5
143% 1.7 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 56%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Hynix HMT351U6EFR8C-PB Micron 8JTF25664AZ-1G6M1 14GB
1600, 1600, 1600, 1600 MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 2048 MB
Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples
52.2% Above average
MC Read 18.7
MC Write 19.4
MC Mixed 16
52% 18 GB/s
SC Read 14.5
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.6
45% 15.8 GB/s
Latency 74
54% 74 ns
Poor: 53% ↑
This bench: 52.2%
 Great: 58%
Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU GPU SSD HDD RAM MBD
Typical OptiPlex 9010 Builds (Compare 3,874 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 63%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 7%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Dell OptiPlex 9010

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel  $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples1,834x
Core i5-3470Intel  $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples769x
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples672x
GPU
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples468x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia  $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples359x
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel  $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples359x
SSD
A400 240GBKingston  $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples159x
860 Evo 500GBSamsung  $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples82x
850 Evo 250GBSamsung  $100Bench 103%, 951,591 samples56x
RAM
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 4x4GBHynixBench 58%, 7,298 samples95x
HMT351U6CFR8C-PB 2x4GBHynixBench 53%, 17,809 samples88x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples71x
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 64% - Good Total price: $325
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest
Amazon Ebay
deals
CPU GPU SSD HDD USB RAM MBD
Build Test EFps
Can You Run It?
►
YouTube
*NEW*
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback