Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 82%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 21%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (58th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 42 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics23.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive80.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Sub-optimal background CPU (15%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO  (all builds)
Memory8.9 GB free of 32 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180709
Uptime1.6 Days
Run DateMar 14 '19 at 19:01
Run Duration172 Seconds
Run User CAN-User
Background CPU 15%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (58th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 7 2700X-$210
AM4, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads
Base clock 3.7 GHz, turbo 3.65 GHz (avg)
Performing above expectations (78th percentile)
81.6% Excellent
Memory 73.5
1-Core 127
2-Core 250
82% 150 Pts
4-Core 480
8-Core 838
80% 659 Pts
64-Core 1,154
71% 1,154 Pts
Poor: 61%
This bench: 81.6%
Great: 89%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2542 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
23.3% Poor
Lighting 26.3
Reflection 30.4
Parallax 24.7
22% 27.1 fps
MRender 37.6
Gravity 26.3
Splatting 34.3
27% 32.8 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 23.3%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52
21GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 153 114 113 112 109 107 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
80.2% Excellent
Read 465
Write 217
Mixed 174
SusWrite 118
54% 243 MB/s
4K Read 31.7
4K Write 98.4
4K Mixed 33.7
143% 54.6 MB/s
DQ Read 372
DQ Write 122
DQ Mixed 183
152% 226 MB/s
Poor: 75%
This bench: 80.2%
Great: 128%
Asmt 2115 250GB
179GB free
Firmware: 0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 368 319 319 319 319 293 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
69.6% Good
Read 397
Write 380
Mixed 340
SusWrite 323
81% 360 MB/s
4K Read 22.5
4K Write 34.4
4K Mixed 27.4
87% 28.1 MB/s
DQ Read 148
DQ Write 149
DQ Mixed 146
111% 148 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.6%
Great: 72%
Seagate FireCuda SSHD 2TB (2016)-$79
432GB free
Firmware: CC41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 104 102 103 102 102 103 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
79.8% Very good
Read 174
Write 191
Mixed 28.5
SusWrite 103
90% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 5.2
4K Mixed 1.9
353% 2.73 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.8%
Great: 110%
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016)-$80
1.5TB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 201 209 207 210 209 210 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
116% Outstanding
Read 196
Write 164
Mixed 84.2
SusWrite 208
119% 163 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.9
159% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 116%
Great: 114%
Generic STORAGE DEVICE 32GB
29GB free, PID null
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 26 14 23 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
19.5% Very poor
Read 27.8
Write 11
Mixed 6.7
SusWrite 16.9
18% 15.6 MB/s
4K Read 4.3
4K Write 3.5
4K Mixed 3.5
254% 3.77 MB/s
Poor: 5%
This bench: 19.5%
Great: 20%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C16 4x8GB-$113
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR4 2133 MHz clocked @ 1067 MHz
Performing below potential (0th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
32.9% Below average
MC Read 11.6
MC Write 9.4
MC Mixed 11.1
31% 10.7 GB/s
SC Read 11.8
SC Write 10.8
SC Mixed 12.6
34% 11.7 GB/s
Latency 93.6
43% 93.6 ns
Poor: 64%
This bench: 32.9%
Great: 120%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO Builds (Compare 1,108 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 98%
Nuclear submarine
Desktop
Desktop 86%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 96%
Nuclear submarine

Motherboard: Asus ROG CROSSHAIR VII HERO - $250

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 69% - Good Total price: $988
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback