Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 10%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 84.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.04% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive92.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardGigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H  (all builds)
Memory5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.9 GHz
Display1152 x 864 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20120822
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 14 '19 at 14:55
Run Duration196 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (56th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-3770K-$175
Intel(R) Core(TM) i7-3770K CPU @ 3.50GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 4.1 GHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
84.1% Excellent
Memory 97.5
1-Core 117
2-Core 234
86% 149 Pts
4-Core 382
8-Core 589
60% 485 Pts
64-Core 584
36% 584 Pts
Poor: 59%
This bench: 84.1%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 440
EVGA(3842 1441) 1GB
CLim: 810 MHz, MLim: 400 MHz, Ram: 1GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
4.04% Terrible
Lighting 5
Reflection 5.88
Parallax 3.94
4% 4.94 fps
MRender 6.67
Gravity 4.97
Splatting 3.57
4% 5.07 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.04%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
391GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 272 284 287 292 291 292 MB/s
Performing below expectations (25th percentile)
92.2% Outstanding
Read 496
Write 455
Mixed 438
SusWrite 286
94% 419 MB/s
4K Read 34.9
4K Write 54.8
4K Mixed 41.6
135% 43.8 MB/s
DQ Read 287
DQ Write 280
DQ Mixed 276
209% 281 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 92.2%
Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80
401GB free
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 424 438 430 428 428 328 MB/s
Performing below expectations (40th percentile)
101% Outstanding
Read 497
Write 462
Mixed 447
SusWrite 413
102% 455 MB/s
4K Read 35
4K Write 56
4K Mixed 42.5
137% 44.5 MB/s
DQ Read 285
DQ Write 289
DQ Mixed 276
211% 283 MB/s
Poor: 74%
This bench: 101%
Great: 129%
WD Black 2TB (2013)-$48
246GB free
Firmware: 01.01A01
SusWrite @10s intervals: 52 50 65 110 108 110 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (2nd percentile)
51.3% Above average
Read 96.6
Write 56.7
Mixed 68.1
SusWrite 82.3
56% 75.9 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.1
4K Mixed 0.5
101% 0.73 MB/s
Poor: 60%
This bench: 51.3%
Great: 112%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
964GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 84 85 85 86 86 86 MB/s
Performing above expectations (69th percentile)
49.4% Average
Read 86.8
Write 84.1
Mixed 63.9
SusWrite 85.4
59% 80 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.5
116% 0.83 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 49.4%
Great: 63%
WD Black 2TB (2010)-$107
245GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 86 87 87 87 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
62% Good
Read 129
Write 125
Mixed 106
SusWrite 86.4
83% 112 MB/s
4K Read 1.4
4K Write 2.6
4K Mixed 1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 44%
This bench: 62%
Great: 85%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$170
964GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 102 104 105 105 105 106 MB/s
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
50.4% Above average
Read 70.5
Write 101
Mixed 86.9
SusWrite 105
67% 90.7 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.7
158% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 50.4%
Great: 63%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
G.SKILL Sniper DDR3 1866 C9 2x4GB
2 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1867 MHz
Performing way above expectations (98th percentile)
71.3% Very good
MC Read 25.9
MC Write 25
MC Mixed 22.5
70% 24.5 GB/s
SC Read 20.5
SC Write 20.6
SC Mixed 21.7
60% 20.9 GB/s
Latency 48.4
83% 48.4 ns
Poor: 30%
This bench: 71.3%
Great: 69%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-Z77X-UD5H Builds (Compare 1,211 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 39%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 79%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 32%
Sail boat

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-Z77X-UD5H - $380

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 61% - Good Total price: $849
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback