Performance Results


Gaming 2% Tree trunk	Desktop 29% Raft	Workstation 2% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a relatively low single core score, this CPU can handle email, light web browsing and basic audio/video playback, but it will struggle to handle CPU intensive tasks. Finally, with a gaming score of 30.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is poor.
Graphics	1.57% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Very high background CPU (90%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

System	Lenovo 20G8S00R00 (all builds)
Motherboard	LENOVO Intel powered classmate PC
Memory	0.5 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.6 GHz
Display	1366 x 768 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160613
Uptime	2.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 14 '19 at 07:51
Run Duration	129 Seconds
Run User	DNK-User
Background CPU	90%

PC Performing as expected (51^st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Celeron N3150 3,131 User benchmarks, average bench 26% CHV, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 1.6 GHz, turbo 2.1 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (82^nd percentile)	30.2% Below average	Memory 47.2 1-Core 20.1 2-Core 41.3 25% 36.2 Pts	4-Core 79.6 8-Core 76.4 10% 78 Pts	64-Core 79.3 5% 79.3 Pts
Poor: 18% ↑ This bench: 30.2% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Intel HD Graphics 60,712 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Legend(17AA 5057) 1GB Driver: igdumdim64.dll Ver. 20.19.15.5063 Performing above expectations (74^th percentile)	1.57% Terrible	Lighting 1.67 Reflection 2.38 Parallax 2.56 1% 2.2 fps	MRender 2.38 Gravity 1.8 Splatting 2.91 2% 2.36 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.57% Great: 2%

Drive	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung MZNTY128HDHP-000L1 128GB 1,655 User benchmarks, average bench 80% 70GB free (System drive) Firmware: MAT23L0Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 132 100 95 97 92 93 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	51.9% Above average	Read 395 Write 352 Mixed 255 SusWrite 102 62% 276 MB/s	4K Read 24.4 4K Write 27.7 4K Mixed 27.3 87% 26.5 MB/s	DQ Read 25.6 DQ Write 93.4 DQ Mixed 93.6 62% 70.9 MB/s
Poor: 50% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 104%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung 1x4GB 4,437 User benchmarks, average bench 23% 1 of 1 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz Performing as expected (40^th percentile)	18.7% Very poor	MC Read 6.5 MC Write 8 MC Mixed 6.2 20% 6.9 GB/s	SC Read 2.4 SC Write 5 SC Mixed 1.8 9% 3.07 GB/s	Latency 172 23% 172 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 18.7% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 2%

Tree trunk

Desktop 27%

Raft

Workstation 2%

Tree trunk

CPU
Celeron N3150IntelBench 26%, 3,131 samples	1x
Celeron N3160IntelBench 28%, 1,747 samples	1x

GPU
HD GraphicsIntelBench 1%, 60,712 samples	2x

SSD
MZNTY128HDHP-000L1 128GBSamsungBench 80%, 1,655 samples	2x

RAM
1x4GBSamsungBench 23%, 4,437 samples	2x

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16