PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 36.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 62% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Asus P8P67 (all builds) |
Memory | 11.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 2560 x 1440 - 32 Bit Farben |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121101 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 13 '19 at 22:07 |
Run Duration | 159 Seconds |
Run User | DEU-User |
Background CPU | 23% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-2500
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg)
|
77%
Very good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 970-$200
CLim: 1455 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
36.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 840 Evo 250GB-$100
40GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 125 38 34 32 34 MB/s
|
62%
Good
|
|||
Samsung 850 Evo 1TB-$164
26GB free
Firmware: EMT0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 135 196 187 192 143 MB/s
|
70.2%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$51
20GB free
Firmware: CC27
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 118 136 132 127 135 MB/s
|
76%
Very good
|
|||
Seagate Constellation ES.3 2TB-$36
100GB free
Firmware: SN06
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 86 86 87 87 87 MB/s
|
50.5%
Above average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 4x4GB
4 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1600 MHz
|
60.2%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-2500KIntel $246Bench 66%, 143,007 samples | 443x |
Core i7-2600KIntel $319Bench 71%, 147,533 samples | 354x |
Core i7-2600Intel $197Bench 67%, 185,630 samples | 199x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 116x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 101x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 95x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $666 |