Asus PRIME Z370-P

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 33%
Sail boat
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 31%
Sail boat
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (41st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 59 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics39.4% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive3.55% is an extremely low SSD score, this system will benefit from a faster SSD.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionWindows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion.
High background CPU (28%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
20 months ago, 20 months ago.
MotherboardAsus PRIME Z370-P  (all builds)
Memory7.6 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20171113
Uptime7.9 Days
Run DateMar 13 '19 at 20:48
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User BEL-User
Background CPU 28%

 PC Performing as expected (41st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-8700-$300
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.15 GHz (avg)
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
81% Excellent
Memory 78.3
1-Core 123
2-Core 250
84% 151 Pts
4-Core 450
8-Core 766
77% 608 Pts
64-Core 949
64% 949 Pts
Poor: 77%
This bench: 81%
Great: 97%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro P2000
Nvidia(10DE 11B3) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1721 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 5GB, Driver: 386.7
Performing below potential (19th percentile) - Disable monitor sync before benchmarking (50 fps cap detected)
39.4% Below average
Lighting 49
Reflection 53.2
Parallax 45.8
41% 49.3 fps
MRender 48.1
Gravity 47.1
Splatting 54.7
29% 50 fps
Poor: 38%
This bench: 39.4%
Great: 44%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Green 240GB (2018)-$34
73GB free (System drive)
Firmware: UF300000
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.1 12 47 38 35 68 MB/s
Relative performance (0th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
3.55% Terrible
Read 3
Write 0.8
Mixed 1.7
SusWrite 33.9
2% 9.85 MB/s
4K Read 0.2
4K Write 0.6
4K Mixed 2.4
4% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 36%
This bench: 3.55%
Great: 56%
Toshiba DT01ACA200 2TB-$71
1.5TB free
Firmware: MX4OABB0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 191 192 190 191 192 192 MB/s
Performing above expectations (82nd percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 166
Write 193
Mixed 21.5
SusWrite 191
103% 143 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 53%
This bench: 102%
Great: 110%
WD Elements 2TB
1TB free, PID 10b8
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 92 93 91 91 88 MB/s
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
37.7% Below average
Read 86
Write 91.5
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 91
109% 80.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.7
4K Mixed 0.9
90% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 37.7%
Great: 46%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Crucial CT16G4DFD8213.C16FH1 1x16GB
1 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Performing way below expectations (11th percentile)
33.2% Below average
MC Read 10.7
MC Write 12.2
MC Mixed 10.4
32% 11.1 GB/s
SC Read 9.1
SC Write 9.7
SC Mixed 10.1
28% 9.63 GB/s
Latency 83.8
48% 83.8 ns
Poor: 32%
This bench: 33.2%
Great: 42%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical PRIME Z370-P Builds (Compare 7,622 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 58%
Gunboat
Desktop
Desktop 95%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus PRIME Z370-P - $100

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 72% - Very good Total price: $789
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $190Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $240Crucial MX500 250GB $34
Intel Core i5-9400F $165Nvidia RTX 3070 $500Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i5-10600K $268Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $190Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $43Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $64SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $69SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $649SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback