Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 12%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 81%
Aircraft carrier
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (59th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 41 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 88.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics4.22% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive95.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago.
SystemGigabyte H110M-H
MotherboardGigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF  (all builds)
Memory13.2 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20161116
Uptime1.4 Days
Run DateMar 13 '19 at 18:35
Run Duration200 Seconds
Run User IND-User
Background CPU5%

 PC Performing as expected (59th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-7700-$167
U3E1, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.6 GHz, turbo 4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
88.6% Excellent
Memory 92.3
1-Core 132
2-Core 254
90% 160 Pts
4-Core 458
8-Core 712
72% 585 Pts
64-Core 712
44% 712 Pts
Poor: 63%
This bench: 88.6%
Great: 84%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GT 710
Zotac(19DA 6324) 2GB
CLim: 954 MHz, MLim: 1252 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing above expectations (75th percentile)
4.22% Terrible
Lighting 4.97
Reflection 4.54
Parallax 4.91
4% 4.8 fps
MRender 6.48
Gravity 3.9
Splatting 6.17
4% 5.52 fps
Poor: 3%
This bench: 4.22%
Great: 4%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 840 Evo 120GB-$85
78GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EXT0DB6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 315 143 145 145 145 145 MB/s
Performing as expected (54th percentile)
95.1% Outstanding
Read 465
Write 435
Mixed 304
SusWrite 173
77% 344 MB/s
4K Read 34
4K Write 112
4K Mixed 41.7
164% 62.5 MB/s
DQ Read 379
DQ Write 334
DQ Mixed 162
175% 292 MB/s
Poor: 63%
This bench: 95.1%
Great: 108%
Kingston A400 480GB-$38
428GB free
Firmware: SBFK61K1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 383 358 99 105 100 99 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
73.2% Very good
Read 181
Write 106
Mixed 336
SusWrite 191
46% 204 MB/s
4K Read 30.6
4K Write 77.9
4K Mixed 33.8
131% 47.4 MB/s
DQ Read 316
DQ Write 327
DQ Mixed 228
197% 290 MB/s
Poor: 39%
This bench: 73.2%
Great: 102%
Adplus SuperVer 1TB
43GB free
Firmware: 6302
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 134 153 3.5 65 185 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (7th percentile)
30% Poor
Read 300
Write 247
Mixed 143
SusWrite 97.5
44% 197 MB/s
4K Read 11.7
4K Write 17.5
4K Mixed 6.1
35% 11.8 MB/s
DQ Read 49.4
DQ Write 34
DQ Mixed 21.6
22% 35 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 30%
Great: 68%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
957GB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 111 109 113 115 113 113 MB/s
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
46.9% Average
Read 50.2
Write 114
Mixed 55.8
SusWrite 112
61% 83.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.6
4K Mixed 0.4
144% 1.6 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 46.9%
Great: 70%
Seagate ST2000LM015-2E8174 2TB
1.5TB free
Firmware: SDM1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 112 111 114 116 120 120 MB/s
Performing above expectations (62nd percentile)
55.1% Above average
Read 75.5
Write 114
Mixed 55.1
SusWrite 116
66% 90.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 3.3
4K Mixed 0.7
168% 1.57 MB/s
Poor: 31%
This bench: 55.1%
Great: 70%
WD My Passport 25E2 4TB
1.5TB free, PID 25e2
Operating at USB 3.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 107 104 105 104 105 105 MB/s
Performing above expectations (76th percentile)
48.8% Average
Read 97.4
Write 79.7
Mixed 58.1
SusWrite 105
114% 85 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 3.8
4K Mixed 0.8
159% 1.8 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 48.8%
Great: 59%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Crucial CT8G4DFD824A.C16FDD2 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (73rd percentile)
83.6% Excellent
MC Read 31.2
MC Write 31.2
MC Mixed 26.2
84% 29.5 GB/s
SC Read 19.3
SC Write 33.7
SC Mixed 24.5
74% 25.8 GB/s
Latency 63.6
63% 63.6 ns
Poor: 45%
This bench: 83.6%
Great: 98%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical GA-H110M-H-CF Builds (Compare 3,439 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 7%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 62%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 6%
Tree trunk

Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-H110M-H-CF

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 70% - Good Total price: $138
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback