Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing SSD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (28th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 72 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an extremely low single core score, this CPU can barely handle email and light web browsing. Finally, with a gaming score of 23%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very poor.
Graphics	1.34% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Memory	4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 9 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Very high background CPU (92%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

PC Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD E1-6015 APU 163 User benchmarks, average bench 22% P0, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 2 threads Base clock 1.4 GHz Performing as expected (54^th percentile)	23% Poor	Memory 40.8 1-Core 19.6 2-Core 33.4 22% 31.3 Pts	4-Core 32.8 8-Core 32 4% 32.4 Pts	64-Core 39 2% 39 Pts
Poor: 8% ↑ This bench: 23% Great: 32%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD HD 8240 3,521 User benchmarks, average bench 1% HP(103C 2B56) 512MB Ram: 512MB, Driver: 16.12.1 Performing below expectations (25^th percentile)	1.34% Terrible	Lighting 1.47 Reflection 2.88 Parallax 1.91 1% 2.09 fps	MRender 2.24 Gravity 1.17 Splatting 2.43 2% 1.95 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.34% Great: 2%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 905GB free (System drive) Firmware: 03.0 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 165 Write 117 Mixed 85 91% 122 MB/s	4K Read 1 4K Write 2.1 4K Mixed 1 192% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52% Great: 109%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 16GB 298 User benchmarks, average bench 6% 7GB free, PID 1603 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 20 Write 9.2 Mixed 7 13% 12.1 MB/s	4K Read 2.4 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 9% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%
SanDisk Cruzer 8GB 5,405 User benchmarks, average bench 10% 7GB free, PID 5530 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete	Read 16 Write 3.7 Mixed 8.5 10% 9.4 MB/s	4K Read 1.4 4K Write 1 4K Mixed 1.1 77% 1.17 MB/s
Poor: 5% Great: 13%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Samsung M471B5173QH0-YK0 1x4GB 38,580 User benchmarks, average bench 25% 1 of 2 slots used 4GB SODIMM DDR3 1600 MHz clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (6^th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	11.5% Very poor	MC Read 4.4 MC Write 2.7 MC Mixed 4.6 11% 3.9 GB/s	SC Read 1.6 SC Write 2.6 SC Mixed 3.3 7% 2.5 GB/s	Latency 199 20% 199 ns
Poor: 12% ↑ This bench: 11.5% Great: 32%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16