PC Status | Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 46.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 34.3% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 37.4% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Although Windows 8.1 is a recent version of Windows, it's worth upgrading to Windows 10 which has had several improvements made to the user interface including a better homescreen. |
System | Dell XPS720 (all builds) |
Motherboard | Dell 0YU822 |
Memory | 6.9 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 8.1 |
BIOS Date | 20080401 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 13 '19 at 16:38 |
Run Duration | 156 Seconds |
Run User | GBR-User |
Background CPU | 0% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core2 Quad Q6600-$100
Microprocessor, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.4 GHz, turbo 2.4 GHz (avg)
|
46.8%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
AMD R9 280X-$500
XFX(1682 3212) 3GB
CLim: 925 MHz, MLim: 1375 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 17.7.1
Performing below potential (42nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
34.3%
Below average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
M4-ct064 M 64GB
34GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 070H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 75 86 86 89 88 MB/s
|
37.4%
Below average
|
|||
Samsung Spinpoint F3 1TB-$83
931GB free
Firmware: 1AJ1
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 131 135 134 136 138 MB/s
|
73.2%
Very good
|
|||
Kingston DataTraveler SE9 8GB
3GB free, PID 1689
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 2.3 2.9 2.8 2 2.9 2.8 MB/s
|
4.12%
Terrible
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR
Performing below potential (23rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
17%
Very poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core2 Quad Q6600Intel $100Bench 42%, 59,658 samples | 17x |
Core2 Extreme Q6850IntelBench 47%, 1,078 samples | 12x |
Core2 Extreme Q6800IntelBench 47%, 252 samples | 3x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 5x |
GTX 480Nvidia $500Bench 20%, 3,874 samples | 4x |
HD 7850AMD $174Bench 19%, 49,592 samples | 4x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 54% - Above average | Total price: $238 |