| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (27th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 73 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
| Graphics | 15.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
| Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
| Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
Very high background CPU (45%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX (all builds) |
| Memory | 4.7 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.1 GHz |
| Display | 1440 x 900 - 32 Bit couleurs |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20141002 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 13 '19 at 14:10 |
| Run Duration | 110 Seconds |
| Run User | FRA-User |
| Background CPU | 45% |
PC Performing below expectations (27th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
57.7%
Above average
|
47% 70.2 Pts
|
26% 202 Pts
|
15% 249 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
|
15.5%
Very poor
|
14% 18.3 fps
|
18% 22.9 fps
| |
| Drive | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
OOS2000G 2TB
1.5TB free (System drive)
Firmware:
SusWrite @10s intervals: 30 43 35 46 49 63 MB/s
|
32.7%
Below average
|
36% 48.6 MB/s
|
68% 0.47 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Unknown 905458-026.A00LF 905458-026.A00LF 8GB
1066, 1066 MHz
4096, 4096 MB
|
36.2%
Below average
|
36% 12.6 GB/s
|
23% 8.13 GB/s
|
53% 75.2 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical N68-GS4/USB3 FX Builds (Compare 32 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock N68-GS4/USB3 FX
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 11x |
| FX-8320EAMD $87Bench 58%, 33,199 samples | 8x |
| FX-4130 Quad-CoreAMD $150Bench 52%, 8,564 samples | 4x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 4x |
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 4x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 4x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 43% - Average | Total price: $248 |