| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 71.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
| Graphics | 113% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 95.1% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
| Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 (all builds) |
| Memory | 9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20170616 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 13 '19 at 00:53 |
| Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
| Run User | USA-User |
| Background CPU | 21% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
71.5%
Very good
|
71% 129 Pts
|
67% 557 Pts
|
74% 1196 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia GTX 1080-Ti-$485
EVGA(3842 6797) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 3002 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (12th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
113%
Outstanding
|
118% 175 fps
|
112% 138 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100
24GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT03B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 313 76 78 85 84 83 MB/s
|
95.1%
Outstanding
|
77% 346 MB/s
|
168% 58.7 MB/s
|
272% 363 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016)-$51
171GB free
Firmware: CC26
SusWrite @10s intervals: 128 127 128 129 129 129 MB/s
|
79.3%
Very good
|
87% 119 MB/s
|
161% 1.1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$40
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz
Relative performance (0th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
32.2%
Below average
|
31% 10.8 GB/s
|
30% 10.5 GB/s
|
37% 108 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical GA-AX370-Gaming 5 Builds (Compare 678 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Gigabyte GA-AX370-Gaming 5 - $246
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| Ryzen 7 1700AMD $195Bench 69%, 144,475 samples | 100x |
| Ryzen 7 1700XAMD $225Bench 71%, 66,470 samples | 88x |
| Ryzen 7 1800XAMD $60Bench 72%, 30,050 samples | 75x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples | 70x |
| GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples | 52x |
| GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 49x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $1,061 |