PC Status | Overall this PC is performing way below expectations (18th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 82 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including light gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.8%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average. |
Graphics | 29.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | MEI Bxxx (all builds) |
Motherboard | ASRock B250M-HDV |
Memory | 9.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20161206 |
Uptime | 4.8 Days |
Run Date | Mar 12 '19 at 19:27 |
Run Duration | 125 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 83% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-7500-$89
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.55 GHz (avg)
|
58.8%
Above average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 417.71
Performing below potential (59th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
29.1%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BX500 240GB-$29
122GB free (System drive)
Firmware: M6CR013
SusWrite @10s intervals: 135 302 25 168 160 99 MB/s
|
30.2%
Below average
|
|||
Toshiba DT01ACA100 1TB-$31
250GB free
Firmware: MS2OA750
SusWrite @10s intervals: 85 83 85 94 95 95 MB/s
|
32.4%
Below average
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Crucial BLS8G4D240FSB.16FBD2 2x8GB
2 of 2 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
|
62%
Good
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i5-7500Intel $89Bench 67%, 149,467 samples | 72x |
Core i5-6500Intel $67Bench 64%, 241,476 samples | 45x |
Core i7-6700Intel $180Bench 72%, 282,363 samples | 24x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 49x |
HD 530 (Desktop Skylake)IntelBench 5%, 188,220 samples | 17x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 10x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 76% - Very good | Total price: $228 |