HP EliteDesk 705 G4 DM 35W (TAA)

Performance Results

Benchmarks - missing GPU
Gaming
Gaming 0%
Incomplete
Desktop
Desktop 0%
Incomplete
Workstation
Workstation 0%
Incomplete
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (51st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 49 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average.
Boot Drive92.4% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Very high background CPU (42%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
SystemHP EliteDesk 705 G4 DM 35W (TAA)  (all builds)
MotherboardHP 83E9
Memory11.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180913
Uptime0.5 Days
Run DateMar 12 '19 at 15:44
Run Duration112 Seconds
Run User USA-User
Background CPU 42%

 PC Performing as expected (51st percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 PRO 2400GE w/ Radeon Vega Graphics
AM4, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.1 GHz (avg)
Performing below expectations (36th percentile)
62.7% Good
Memory 69.8
1-Core 74.7
2-Core 158
58% 101 Pts
4-Core 300
8-Core 450
47% 375 Pts
64-Core 322
20% 322 Pts
Poor: 49%
This bench: 62.7%
Great: 77%
Drive BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
SK hynix BC501 HFM256GDJTNG-8310A 256GB
192GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 80002C00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 366 353 229 238 194 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (20th percentile)
92.4% Outstanding
Read 869
Write 368
Mixed 630
SusWrite 303
120% 542 MB/s
4K Read 26.5
4K Write 46.6
4K Mixed 29.7
103% 34.3 MB/s
DQ Read 169
DQ Write 156
DQ Mixed 160
121% 162 MB/s
Poor: 72%
This bench: 92.4%
Great: 164%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Micron 8ATF1G64HZ-2G6E1 Hynix HMA81GS6CJR8N-VK 16GB
2667, 2667 MHz
8192, 8192 MB
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
84.3% Excellent
MC Read 31.3
MC Write 33.6
MC Mixed 28.6
89% 31.2 GB/s
SC Read 18.8
SC Write 30.4
SC Mixed 21.3
67% 23.5 GB/s
Latency 102
39% 102 ns
Poor: 58%
This bench: 84.3%
Great: 83%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical EliteDesk 705 G4 DM 35W (TAA) Builds (Compare 78 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 71%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 12%
Tree trunk

System: HP EliteDesk 705 G4 DM 35W (TAA)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback