PC Status | Overall this PC is performing as expected (50th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 50 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. |
Processor | With a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 45.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average. |
Graphics | 44.1% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 55.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications. |
Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
System | HP xw8600 Workstation (all builds) |
Motherboard | Hewlett-Packard 0A98h |
Memory | 29.5 GB free of 32.001 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
Display | 1360 x 768 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20120920 |
Uptime | 0 Days |
Run Date | Mar 12 '19 at 10:44 |
Run Duration | 195 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 55% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5450
XU1 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.95 GHz (avg)
|
45.9%
Average
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 780-$329
Nvidia(10DE 105A) 3GB
CLim: 1202 MHz, MLim: 1502 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (49th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
44.1%
Average
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Sandisk SD7TB3Q-256G-1006 256GB
166GB free (System drive)
Firmware: X2180306
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 175 175 184 183 184 MB/s
|
55.9%
Above average
|
|||
Crucial MTFDDAV256TBN-1AR15ABHA 256GB
238GB free
Firmware: HPC
SusWrite @10s intervals: 208 215 212 222 222 222 MB/s
|
60.8%
Good
|
|||
WD WD1600HLHX-75JJPV0 160GB
66GB free
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 122 119 121 124 125 123 MB/s
|
71.6%
Very good
|
|||
WD VelociRaptor 500GB-$62
257GB free
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 178 177 173 181 180 181 MB/s
|
97.1%
Outstanding
|
|||
WD WD3000HLHX-01JJPV0 300GB
279GB free
Firmware: 04.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 133 131 128 133 134 134 MB/s
|
78.2%
Very good
|
|||
USB 3.0 Flash Drive 16GB
10GB free, PID 0001
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 4.6 8.8 9.5 9 9.3 9.1 MB/s
|
10.4%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Unknown 65GB
null MHz
4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096, 33792 MB
|
20%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 826 samples | 21x |
CPU: Intel Xeon X54501stBench 47%, 324 samples | 17x |
Xeon X5450Intel $299Bench 50%, 5,870 samples | 12x |
GPU | |
---|---|
GeForce GT 730NvidiaBench 5%, 164,888 samples | 9x |
Quadro FX 5600NvidiaBench 6%, 254 samples | 9x |
GTX 750-TiNvidia $92Bench 17%, 309,423 samples | 8x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 46% - Average | Total price: $153 |