Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 4%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 4%
Tree trunk
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 57.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics1.05% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive30.2% is low SSD score. With a better SSD this system will boot faster, make applications more responsive and reduce IO wait times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
High background CPU (23%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
MotherboardAsrock 960GM/U3S3 FX  (all builds)
Memory5.3 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1280 x 1024 - 32 Bit Farben
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20120521
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 12 '19 at 08:33
Run Duration170 Seconds
Run User DEU-User
Background CPU 23%

 PC Performing below expectations (39th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Phenom II X4 965-$144
CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.4 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (85th percentile)
57.6% Above average
Memory 87.4
1-Core 50.4
2-Core 100
52% 79.3 Pts
4-Core 161
8-Core 179
22% 170 Pts
64-Core 194
12% 194 Pts
Poor: 35%
This bench: 57.6%
Great: 61%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GeForce 210
Device(0000 0000) 1GB
Ram: 1GB, Driver: 341.95
Performing as expected (50th percentile)
1.05% Terrible
Lighting 1.13
Reflection 2.31
Parallax 0.5
1% 1.31 fps
MRender 2.19
Gravity 0.87
Splatting 1.7
1% 1.58 fps
Poor: 1%
This bench: 1.05%
Great: 1%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Sandisk S128G 126GB
31GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3.2.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 123 104 106 58 44 26 MB/s
Performing below potential (10th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
30.2% Below average
Read 271
Write 213
Mixed 30.5
SusWrite 77
33% 148 MB/s
4K Read 15.1
4K Write 11.9
4K Mixed 11.9
44% 13 MB/s
DQ Read 33.2
DQ Write 12.5
DQ Mixed 20.2
16% 22 MB/s
Poor: 29%
This bench: 30.2%
Great: 56%
Samsung Spinpoint F2 1TB-$60
512GB free
Firmware: 1AG01118
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 89 90 90 90 90 MB/s
Performing above expectations (63rd percentile)
47.9% Average
Read 76.7
Write 85.4
Mixed 46.3
SusWrite 90
55% 74.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1.2
4K Mixed 0.8
140% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 28%
This bench: 47.9%
Great: 58%
Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 3TB-$40
1TB free
Firmware: CC4H
SusWrite @10s intervals: 158 152 160 164 163 162 MB/s
Performing as expected (51st percentile)
89.5% Excellent
Read 153
Write 126
Mixed 77.5
SusWrite 160
95% 129 MB/s
4K Read 0.7
4K Write 1
4K Mixed 0.6
114% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 89.5%
Great: 113%
Seagate Barracuda Green 1.5TB-$130
518GB free
Firmware: CC32
SusWrite @10s intervals: 80 80 81 86 80 85 MB/s
Performing below expectations (31st percentile)
47.4% Average
Read 83.6
Write 80.8
Mixed 53.7
SusWrite 81.8
55% 75 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.8
4K Mixed 0.7
113% 0.67 MB/s
Poor: 33%
This bench: 47.4%
Great: 69%
WD 6400AAK External 640GB
522GB free, PID 1001
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 19 20 22 23 24 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
13% Very poor
Read 23.1
Write 24.3
Mixed 21.8
SusWrite 21.2
31% 22.6 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.7
80% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 13%
This bench: 13%
Great: 22%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB
2 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM 667 MHz
Performing below potential (11th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP
34.2% Below average
MC Read 14.9
MC Write 7.7
MC Mixed 12.5
33% 11.7 GB/s
SC Read 7.2
SC Write 6.4
SC Mixed 8.8
21% 7.47 GB/s
Latency 70.2
57% 70.2 ns
Poor: 28%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 63%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical 960GM/U3S3 FX Builds (Compare 93 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 21%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 64%
Destroyer
Workstation
Workstation 16%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asrock 960GM/U3S3 FX - $131

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 105% - Outstanding Total price: $237
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182Nvidia RTX 4070 $409Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback