PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (37th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 63 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 62.6%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good. |
Graphics | 30.7% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | The boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times. |
Memory | 8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system. |
OS Version | Windows 10 is the most recent version of Windows, and the best to date in our opinion. |
System | HP 550-109a (all builds) |
Motherboard | HP 2B47 |
Memory | 3.6 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.6 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20151110 |
Uptime | 1.4 Days |
Run Date | Mar 12 '19 at 06:45 |
Run Duration | 163 Seconds |
Run User | AUS-User |
Background CPU | 74% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Extreme |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() |
62.6%
Good
|
66% 141 Pts
|
46% 328 Pts
|
23% 345 Pts
|
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$155
Gigabyte(1458 3763) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 419.17
|
30.7%
Below average
|
30% 104 fps
|
31% 91.6 fps
|
|
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Seagate Barracuda 7200.14 2TB-$58
748GB free (System drive)
Firmware: HP51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 89 105 100 122 126 132 MB/s
|
75.5%
Very good
|
92% 125 MB/s
|
130% 0.93 MB/s
|
|
![]() ASMT 2115 500GB
408GB free, PID 1153
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 15 MB/s
|
10.1%
Very poor
|
31% 24.3 MB/s
|
46% 0.6 MB/s
|
|
![]() Seagate Expansion Desk 2TB
639GB free, PID 3320
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
|
25.3%
Poor
|
33% 24.7 MB/s
|
220% 2.3 MB/s
|
|
![]() WD Elements 1TB
148GB free, PID 1021
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s
|
13%
Very poor
|
36% 27 MB/s
|
77% 0.93 MB/s
|
|
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
![]() Micron 16KTF1G64AZ-1G6E1 1x8GB
1 of 2 slots used
8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1600 MHz
|
31%
Below average
|
29% 10.3 GB/s
|
25% 8.83 GB/s
|
48% 83.4 ns
|
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
![]() |
|
---|---|
GTX 745 (OEM)Nvidia $60Bench 10%, 14,502 samples | 21x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 31%, 463,263 samples | 2x |
Radeon HD 5570AMDBench 4%, 6,676 samples | 1x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 60% - Good | Total price: $239 |