Asus M4A87TD/USB3

Performance Results


Gaming 5% Tree trunk	Desktop 52% Yacht	Workstation 4% Tree trunk


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 58.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics	1.1% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	71.1% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (18%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus M4A87TD/USB3 (all builds)
Memory	5.2 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110308
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 12 '19 at 03:08
Run Duration	163 Seconds
Run User	AUS-User
Background CPU	18%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
AMD Phenom II X4 955-$83 41,403 User benchmarks, average bench 51% AM3, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (91^st percentile)	58.3% Above average	Memory 86.4 1-Core 47 2-Core 94.6 50% 76 Pts	4-Core 176 8-Core 188 24% 182 Pts	64-Core 189 12% 189 Pts
Poor: 38% ↑ This bench: 58.3% Great: 60%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5450 66,079 User benchmarks, average bench 1% Gigabyte(1458 227F) 1GB Driver: aticfx64.dll Ver. 15.201.1151.1008 Performing as expected (50^th percentile)	1.1% Terrible	Lighting 1.33 Reflection 1.73 Parallax 1.62 1% 1.56 fps	MRender 1.62 Gravity 0.9 Splatting 1.52 1% 1.35 fps
Poor: 1% ↑ This bench: 1.1% Great: 1%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 407GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 181 189 191 194 194 195 MB/s Performing way below expectations (4^th percentile)	71.1% Very good	Read 366 Write 377 Mixed 330 SusWrite 191 71% 316 MB/s	4K Read 32.7 4K Write 59.7 4K Mixed 41 134% 44.5 MB/s	DQ Read 39.8 DQ Write 91.9 DQ Mixed 53.4 44% 61.7 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 71.1% Great: 129%
Samsung 860 Evo 500GB-$80 762,998 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 460GB free Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 188 192 192 195 195 195 MB/s Performing way below expectations (8^th percentile)	77.1% Very good	Read 401 Write 381 Mixed 283 SusWrite 193 70% 314 MB/s	4K Read 36.5 4K Write 63.6 4K Mixed 45.2 147% 48.4 MB/s	DQ Read 45 DQ Write 100 DQ Mixed 59.2 49% 68.1 MB/s
Poor: 74% ↑ This bench: 77.1% Great: 129%
WD WD2500BB-98DWA0 250GB 325 User benchmarks, average bench 24% 230GB free Firmware: 20.00K20 SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 59 61 62 62 62 MB/s Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	35% Below average	Read 60.9 Write 57.6 Mixed 36.3 SusWrite 60.9 40% 53.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.6 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.8 138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 35% Great: 33%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$139 139,542 User benchmarks, average bench 44% 43GB free Firmware: 80.00A80 SusWrite @10s intervals: 40 44 35 42 39 43 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	24.6% Poor	Read 44.8 Write 45.2 Mixed 33.9 SusWrite 40.6 30% 41.1 MB/s	4K Read 0.7 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 131% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 29% ↑ This bench: 24.6% Great: 59%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston 9905471-009.A00LF 2x4GB 560 User benchmarks, average bench 45% 2 of 4 slots used 8GB DIMM 667 MHz Performing below potential (22^nd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	34.5% Below average	MC Read 15 MC Write 7.6 MC Mixed 12.7 34% 11.8 GB/s	SC Read 7.2 SC Write 6.4 SC Mixed 9.9 22% 7.83 GB/s	Latency 71 56% 71 ns
Poor: 26% ↑ This bench: 34.5% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical M4A87TD/USB3 Builds (Compare 175 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 9%

Tree trunk

Desktop 54%

Yacht

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus M4A87TD/USB3

CPU
Phenom II X4 955AMD $83Bench 51%, 41,403 samples	41x
Phenom II X6 1055TAMD $175Bench 54%, 23,835 samples	24x
Phenom II X4 965AMD $144Bench 53%, 43,442 samples	22x

GPU
HD 6850AMDBench 12%, 31,600 samples	8x
GTX 550-TiNvidia $250Bench 9%, 54,392 samples	6x
Radeon HD 5450AMDBench 1%, 66,079 samples	6x

SSD
BX500 120GBCrucial $15Bench 55%, 37,154 samples	7x
BX500 240GBCrucial $29Bench 56%, 142,801 samples	5x
860 Evo 1TBSamsung $130Bench 112%, 602,853 samples	4x

RAM
99U5471-002.A01LF 99U5471-002.A01LF Team--Elite-133300 8GBKingstonBench 26%, 4 samples	3x
M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG M2F4GH64CB8HB6N-CG KRE-D3U1600M/8G000 Hynix HMT125U6TFR8C-H9 18GBNanyaBench 27%, 6 samples	3x
DDR3 2000G DDR3 2000G Kingston 9905403-431.A00LF Kingston 9905403-431.A00LF 12GBAdataBench 27%, 9 samples	3x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 63% - Good

Total price: $98

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16