HP Z600 Workstation

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD, HDD
Gaming 0% Incomplete	Desktop 0% Incomplete	Workstation 0% Incomplete


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With an average single core score, this CPU can handle browsing the web, email, video playback and the majority of general computing tasks including moderate gaming when coupled with an appropriate GPU. Finally, with a gaming score of 39.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics	5.92% is a very low 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can only handle very basic 3D games but it's fine for general computing tasks.
Memory	12GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 12GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 4 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.

Run History

9 months ago, 9 months ago.

System	HP Z600 Workstation (all builds)
Motherboard	Hewlett-Packard 0B54h
Memory	4.8 GB free of 12.002 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1280 x 720 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 7
BIOS Date	20110311
Uptime	0.1 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '19 at 20:07
Run Duration	152 Seconds
Run User	EGY-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Extreme
1st CPU: Intel Xeon X5560 345 User benchmarks, average bench 50% CPU0 PROCESSOR, 2 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz Performing way below expectations (5^th percentile)	39.2% Below average	1-Core 59.6 2-Core 115 41% 87.2 Pts	4-Core 214 8-Core 363 36% 289 Pts	64-Core 532 36% 532 Pts
Poor: 39% ↑ This bench: 39.2% Great: 54%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia Quadro FX 3800 2,192 User benchmarks, average bench 6% Nvidia(10DE 0661) 1GB Ram: 1GB, Driver: 342.1 Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	5.92% Terrible	Lighting 27.6 Reflection 13.5 Parallax 12.7 7% 17.9 fps	MRender 15.4 Gravity 21.4 Splatting 12.2 6% 16.3 fps
Poor: 6% ↑ This bench: 5.92% Great: 6%

Drives	Sequential	Random 4k
Intel 320 Series 160GB-$90 7,978 User benchmarks, average bench 42% 40GB free (System drive) Firmware: 4PC1 Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete	Read 2,429 Write 44.2 Mixed 87.8 178% 854 MB/s	4K Read 498 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 5.3 763% 169 MB/s
Poor: 32% Great: 51%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$55 518,957 User benchmarks, average bench 105% 202GB free Firmware: EMT0 Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete	Read 2,419 Write 45.8 Mixed 89.8 177% 852 MB/s	4K Read 519 4K Write 2.8 4K Mixed 5.7 795% 176 MB/s
Poor: 76% Great: 125%
Kingston DataTraveler 2.0 8GB 7,383 User benchmarks, average bench 5% 3GB free, PID 1665 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential bench incomplete	Read 21 Write 3.5 Mixed 5.3 9% 9.93 MB/s	4K Read 3.7 4K Write 0 4K Mixed 0 14% 1.23 MB/s
Poor: 3% Great: 8%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown ID:80 2C 9KSF25672PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 9KSF25672PZ-1G4D1 ID:80 2C 18KSF1G72PZ-1G4D1 46GB 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 2048, 2048, 8192, 34816 MB Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	21% Poor	MC Read 7.1 MC Write 6.3 MC Mixed 6.1 19% 6.5 GB/s	SC Read 6.9 SC Write 4.5 SC Mixed 5.9 16% 5.77 GB/s	Latency 82.8 48% 82.8 ns

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money.

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical Z600 Workstation Builds (Compare 4,919 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.

Gaming 15%

Surfboard

Desktop 47%

Yacht

Workstation 49%

Yacht

System: HP Z600 Workstation

CPU
CPU: Intel Xeon X56501stBench 47%, 4,507 samples	734x
CPU: Intel Xeon E56201stBench 41%, 3,198 samples	656x
CPU: Intel Xeon X55701stBench 52%, 1,351 samples	352x

GPU
Quadro 4000NvidiaBench 7%, 8,407 samples	355x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $155Bench 32%, 464,235 samples	315x
Quadro 2000NvidiaBench 7%, 9,186 samples	314x

SSD
850 Evo 250GBSamsung $55Bench 105%, 518,957 samples	162x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $97Bench 113%, 414,632 samples	109x
A400 240GBKingston $32Bench 63%, 93,093 samples	95x

RAM
ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170FH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 162 samples	61x
ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 ID:80 CE M393B5170EH1-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 50%, 99 samples	59x
ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 ID:80 CE M391B5273CH0-CH9 58GBUnknownBench 49%, 96 samples	48x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 21% - Poor

Total price: $55

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $150	Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $244	Crucial MX500 250GB $45
Intel Core i5-9600K $200	AMD RX 590 $180	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $150
Intel Core i7-9700K $360	Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160	Samsung 850 Pro 512GB $230

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $65	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $38	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $58	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $613	SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24