Performance Results


Gaming 64% Destroyer	Desktop 82% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 79.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	77.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

System	Gigabyte Default string
Motherboard	Gigabyte GA-X99-UD3P-CF (all builds)
Memory	10.1 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20160613
Uptime	0.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 11 '19 at 17:03
Run Duration	149 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	8%

PC Performing below expectations (40^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7-5960X-$285 15,468 User benchmarks, average bench 80% SOCKET 0, 1 CPU, 8 cores, 16 threads Base clock 3 GHz, turbo 2.9 GHz (avg) Performing as expected (53^rd percentile)	79.5% Very good	Memory 90.3 1-Core 86.3 2-Core 195 72% 124 Pts	4-Core 370 8-Core 675 63% 523 Pts	64-Core 968 60% 968 Pts
Poor: 70% ↑ This bench: 79.5% Great: 94%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-$132 1,459,281 User benchmarks, average bench 80% Gigabyte(1458 36FC) CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 398.36 Performing below potential (34^th percentile) - GPU OC Guide	77.4% Very good	Lighting 95.5 Reflection 106 Parallax 101 78% 101 fps	MRender 92.3 Gravity 92.6 Splatting 95.1 77% 93.3 fps
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 77.4% Great: 88%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45 240,629 User benchmarks, average bench 199% 66GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 1,750 Write 1,437 Mixed 703 286% 1,297 MB/s	4K Read 44.1 4K Write 98.5 4K Mixed 41 172% 61.2 MB/s	DQ Read 656 DQ Write 460 DQ Mixed 524 401% 547 MB/s
Poor: 142% Great: 236%
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$100 951,591 User benchmarks, average bench 103% 30GB free Firmware: EMT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 375 287 286 277 261 218 MB/s Performing as expected (44^th percentile)	103% Outstanding	Read 467 Write 449 Mixed 372 SusWrite 284 88% 393 MB/s	4K Read 36 4K Write 81.8 4K Mixed 51.4 164% 56.4 MB/s	DQ Read 377 DQ Write 329 DQ Mixed 352 264% 353 MB/s
Poor: 72% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 124%
Samsung 850 Pro 2TB-$320 2,669 User benchmarks, average bench 108% 2TB free Firmware: EXM04B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 437 470 473 452 454 452 MB/s Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)	114% Outstanding	Read 470 Write 446 Mixed 409 SusWrite 456 100% 445 MB/s	4K Read 34.9 4K Write 85.3 4K Mixed 50.4 163% 56.9 MB/s	DQ Read 384 DQ Write 332 DQ Mixed 353 266% 356 MB/s
Poor: 78% ↑ This bench: 114% Great: 130%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Kingston HyperX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB 51,435 User benchmarks, average bench 86% 2 of 4 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2133 MHz Performing below potential (7^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	66.7% Good	MC Read 29.1 MC Write 21.4 MC Mixed 22.1 69% 24.2 GB/s	SC Read 14 SC Write 16.7 SC Mixed 17.7 46% 16.1 GB/s	Latency 66.8 60% 66.8 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 66.7% Great: 108%

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

Gaming 82%

Aircraft carrier

Desktop 82%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 73%

Battleship

GPU
GTX 1080Nvidia $400Bench 102%, 1,082,454 samples	15x
GTX 1080-TiNvidia $485Bench 124%, 840,268 samples	11x
GTX 1660S (Super)Nvidia $233Bench 71%, 428,800 samples	11x

SSD
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $94Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	10x
BarraCuda 120 SSD ZA500CM10003 500GBSeagateBench 117%, 6,074 samples	5x
Black SN750 NVMe PCIe M.2 500GB (2019)WD $37Bench 244%, 109,999 samples	5x

RAM
BLS4G4D240FSA.8FAR 4x4GBCrucialBench 85%, 283 samples	8x
BLS8G4D240FSA.16FAR 2x8GBCrucialBench 71%, 347 samples	7x
Vengeance LPX DDR4 2666 C16 2x8GBCorsair $42Bench 77%, 131,007 samples	6x

Value: 62% - Good

Total price: $624

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16