Asus Commando

Performance Results

Benchmarks - excluding SSD
Gaming
Gaming 20%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 30%
Raft
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (40th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 60 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a below average single core score, this CPU can handle email, web browsing and audio/video playback but it will struggle to handle modern 3D games or workstation tasks such as video editing. Finally, with a gaming score of 31.4%, this CPUs suitability for 3D gaming is below average.
Graphics21.7% is a below average 3D score (GTX 1070 = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot DriveThe boot partition is located on a mechanical or hybrid drive. Moving the system to an SSD will yield far faster boot times, better system responsiveness and faster application load times.
Memory8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus Commando  (all builds)
Memory1.4 GB free of 8 GB @ 0.7 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors,
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20081222
Uptime0.6 Days
Run DateMar 10 '19 at 18:59
Run Duration187 Seconds
Run User HUN-User
Background CPU2%

 PC Performing as expected (40th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Extreme
Intel Core2 Quad Q9550-$270
LGA 775, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 2.85 GHz
Performing as expected (60th percentile)
31.4% Below average
1-Core 50.7
2-Core 101
36% 76.1 Pts
4-Core 195
8-Core 202
27% 199 Pts
64-Core 201
14% 201 Pts
Poor: 22%
This bench: 31.4%
Great: 37%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GeForce GTX 470
Gigabyte(1458 34F8) 1.2GB
CLim: 630 MHz, MLim: 837 MHz, Ram: 1.2GB, Driver: 391.35
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
21.7% Poor
Lighting 59.3
Reflection 79.7
Parallax 70.1
20% 69.7 fps
MRender 68.5
Gravity 46.9
Splatting 52.5
23% 56 fps
Poor: 16%
This bench: 21.7%
Great: 24%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
WD Black 1.5TB (2010)
246GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 45 50 53 59 61 64 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (12th percentile)
47.1% Average
Read 108
Write 88.5
Mixed 89.3
SusWrite 55.3
64% 85.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.8
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 1.1
200% 1.43 MB/s
Poor: 41%
This bench: 47.1%
Great: 83%
Samsung HD250HJ 250GB
57GB free
Firmware: FH100-05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 53 52 59 61 63 65 MB/s
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
43.4% Average
Read 92.5
Write 82.3
Mixed 56.3
SusWrite 58.8
53% 72.5 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
134% 0.87 MB/s
Poor: 18%
This bench: 43.4%
Great: 56%
Samsung HD160JJ 160GB-$85
19GB free
Firmware: ZM100-41
SusWrite @10s intervals: 36 41 40 43 43 41 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
21.5% Poor
Read 33.7
Write 35.4
Mixed 28.9
SusWrite 40.8
26% 34.7 MB/s
4K Read 0.6
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.8
138% 0.9 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 21.5%
Great: 34%
WD Green 1.5TB (2010)-$61
165GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 35 39 40 43 43 40 MB/s
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
34.2% Below average
Read 78.5
Write 66.8
Mixed 61.8
SusWrite 40.2
46% 61.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.1
4K Mixed 0.8
165% 1.27 MB/s
Poor: 23%
This bench: 34.2%
Great: 60%
WD Elements 500GB
279GB free, PID 1023
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 13 13 13 19 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (9th percentile)
11.4% Very poor
Read 29.5
Write 23.8
Mixed 21
SusWrite 14
28% 22.1 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 1.3
4K Mixed 0.6
66% 0.77 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 11.4%
Great: 41%
WD 5000BEV External 500GB
392GB free, PID 1010
Operating at USB 2.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 19 14 13 14 14 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
12.9% Very poor
Read 28.3
Write 23.8
Mixed 22.8
SusWrite 14.5
29% 22.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.8
4K Mixed 0.7
87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 10%
This bench: 12.9%
Great: 19%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 4x2GB
4 of 4 slots used
8GB DIMM SDRAM
Performing as expected (55th percentile)
22.2% Poor
MC Read 7.2
MC Write 6.7
MC Mixed 6.6
20% 6.83 GB/s
SC Read 6.1
SC Write 6.3
SC Mixed 6.4
18% 6.27 GB/s
Latency 79.4
50% 79.4 ns
Poor: 14%
This bench: 22.2%
Great: 44%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds (explanation by AdoredTV).

Typical Commando Builds (Compare 198 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 19%
Surfboard
Desktop
Desktop 31%
Sail boat
Workstation
Workstation 19%
Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus Commando

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 30% - Below average Total price: $349
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9400F $143AMD RX 580 $172Samsung 850 Evo 250GB $86
AMD Ryzen 5 3600 $198Nvidia GTX 1660 $220Samsung 850 Evo 500GB $103
Intel Core i5-9600K $219AMD RX 5700 XT $400Samsung 850 Pro 256GB $195
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 64GB $128
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $695SanDisk Extreme 32GB $48
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $80Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $80SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer Feedback