Asus P7H55-M

Performance Results


Gaming 68% Battle cruiser	Desktop 77% Battleship	Workstation 54% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (56th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 44 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 70.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	98.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	51.9% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P7H55-M (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20100818
Uptime	59.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 10 '19 at 13:46
Run Duration	147 Seconds
Run User	NLD-User
Background CPU	9%

PC Performing as expected (56^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 870-$100 37,228 User benchmarks, average bench 66% LGA1156, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads Base clock 2.95 GHz, turbo 3.2 GHz (avg) Performing above expectations (83^rd percentile)	70.3% Very good	Memory 92.7 1-Core 90.9 2-Core 176 71% 120 Pts	4-Core 261 8-Core 407 41% 334 Pts	64-Core 409 25% 409 Pts
Poor: 53% ↑ This bench: 70.3% Great: 74%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1070-Ti-$299 412,133 User benchmarks, average bench 94% Gigabyte(1458 3792) CLim: 1923 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing way above expectations (87^th percentile)	98.1% Outstanding	Lighting 126 Reflection 136 Parallax 115 102% 125 fps	MRender 96.6 Gravity 127 Splatting 106 90% 110 fps
Poor: 86% ↑ This bench: 98.1% Great: 101%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Pro 256GB-$115 141,929 User benchmarks, average bench 102% 48GB free (System drive) Firmware: EXM02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 193 203 201 196 196 198 MB/s Performing below potential (1^st percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable	51.9% Above average	Read 207 Write 201 Mixed 188 SusWrite 198 45% 199 MB/s	4K Read 21 4K Write 48.9 4K Mixed 27.7 93% 32.5 MB/s	DQ Read 30.1 DQ Write 78.3 DQ Mixed 38.9 34% 49.1 MB/s
Poor: 71% ↑ This bench: 51.9% Great: 124%
Kingston SV100S264G 64GB 1,876 User benchmarks, average bench 21% 20GB free Firmware: D110225a SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 75 61 63 59 46 MB/s Performing above expectations (69^th percentile)	23.6% Poor	Read 158 Write 71.3 Mixed 102 SusWrite 60.7 22% 98 MB/s	4K Read 8.3 4K Write 28.4 4K Mixed 10.8 41% 15.8 MB/s	DQ Read 8.1 DQ Write 28.8 DQ Mixed 13.9 12% 16.9 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 23.6% Great: 30%
Microsoft Storage Space Device 999GB 64,984 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 888GB free Firmware: 0.1 SusWrite @10s intervals: 125 126 129 129 129 129 MB/s Performing below expectations (29^th percentile)	72% Very good	Read 123 Write 118 Mixed 64.4 SusWrite 128 79% 108 MB/s	4K Read 0.8 4K Write 1.5 4K Mixed 0.8 150% 1.03 MB/s
Poor: 41% ↑ This bench: 72% Great: 110%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 16GB 70,565 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1333, 1333, 1333, 1333 MHz 4096, 4096, 4096, 4096 MB Performing above expectations (65^th percentile)	42% Average	MC Read 16.2 MC Write 13.4 MC Mixed 12.7 40% 14.1 GB/s	SC Read 11.8 SC Write 10.5 SC Mixed 12.1 33% 11.5 GB/s	Latency 62.8 64% 62.8 ns
Poor: 25% ↑ This bench: 42% Great: 54%

Take a copy of your results How to check your in-game FPS

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P7H55-M Builds (Compare 446 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 21%

Surfboard

Desktop 71%

Battleship

Workstation 16%

Surfboard

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M

CPU
Core i5 760Intel $100Bench 64%, 34,495 samples	94x
Core i3 540Intel $60Bench 46%, 24,563 samples	71x
Core i7 870Intel $100Bench 66%, 37,228 samples	59x

GPU
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	32x
GT 1030NvidiaBench 14%, 185,384 samples	18x
HD Graphics (Clarkdale 0.733/0.9 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 20,588 samples	17x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	24x
A400 120GBKingston $32Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	18x
A400 480GBKingston $38Bench 74%, 237,487 samples	11x

RAM
8GBUnknownBench 34%, 82,857 samples	161x
16GBUnknownBench 41%, 70,565 samples	118x
12GBUnknownBench 35%, 85,415 samples	51x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 85% - Excellent

Total price: $187

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $134	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $184	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16