Asus P7H55-M LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 14%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 51%
Yacht
Workstation
Workstation 20%
Surfboard
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing below expectations (36th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 64 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 52%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is average.
Graphics4.49% is too low to play 3D games or use CAD packages. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive65.8% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory4GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and although it's sufficient for most games, some will benefit from up to 8GB of RAM. 4GB is also enough for modest file and system caches which allow for a responsive system.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
MotherboardAsus P7H55-M LX  (all builds)
Memory1.8 GB free of 4 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display1600 x 900 - 32 Bit colori
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20100715
Uptime0.1 Days
Run DateMar 10 '19 at 11:43
Run Duration145 Seconds
Run User ITA-User
Background CPU4%

 PC Performing below expectations (36th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i3 550-$168
LGA1156, 1 CPU, 2 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
52% Above average
Memory 70.8
1-Core 76.6
2-Core 150
59% 99.3 Pts
4-Core 194
8-Core 192
26% 193 Pts
64-Core 187
13% 187 Pts
Poor: 39%
This bench: 52%
Great: 53%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
AMD Radeon HD 5670
Sapphire(174B E155) 1GB
Driver: aticfx32.dll Ver. 15.200.1062.1004
Performing below expectations (22nd percentile)
4.49% Terrible
Lighting 21
Reflection 19.8
Parallax 19.1
6% 20 fps
MRender 14
Gravity 15.5
Splatting 13.7
4% 14.4 fps
Poor: 4%
This bench: 4.49%
Great: 5%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Samsung 850 Evo 250GB-$85
58GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 227 223 221 232 223 222 MB/s
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
65.8% Good
Read 250
Write 240
Mixed 228
SusWrite 225
53% 236 MB/s
4K Read 24.1
4K Write 54.2
4K Mixed 32.1
106% 36.8 MB/s
DQ Read 205
DQ Write 193
DQ Mixed 197
148% 198 MB/s
Poor: 77%
This bench: 65.8%
Great: 123%
WD Green 1TB (2010)-$80
73GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 65 64 65 64 64 64 MB/s
Performing as expected (45th percentile)
42.4% Average
Read 83.3
Write 64.5
Mixed 63.4
SusWrite 64.1
51% 68.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 1.4
4K Mixed 0.7
141% 1 MB/s
Poor: 26%
This bench: 42.4%
Great: 59%
JMicron Tech 500GB
284GB free, PID 0562
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 26 26 26 27 27 27 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (5th percentile)
15.3% Very poor
Read 30.9
Write 20.7
Mixed 22.7
SusWrite 26.4
33% 25.2 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 1.6
4K Mixed 0.8
84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 15%
This bench: 15.3%
Great: 416%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Unknown 1x4GB
1 of 2 slots used
4GB DIMM DDR 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (53rd percentile)
24.8% Poor
MC Read 7.9
MC Write 8.3
MC Mixed 8.1
23% 8.1 GB/s
SC Read 8
SC Write 6.6
SC Mixed 7.5
21% 7.37 GB/s
Latency 99.6
40% 99.6 ns
Poor: 12%
This bench: 24.8%
Great: 39%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P7H55-M LX Builds (Compare 1,842 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 11%
Tree trunk
Desktop
Desktop 44%
Speed boat
Workstation
Workstation 27%
Raft

Motherboard: Asus P7H55-M LX

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 38% - Below average Total price: $129
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $156Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $160Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $56
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $47Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $67SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $40Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $70SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback