Asrock H310M-G/M.2

Performance Results


Gaming 61% Destroyer	Desktop 95% Nuclear submarine	Workstation 52% Yacht


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing above expectations (60th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 40 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle moderate workstation, and even light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 91.7%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics	60.3% is a good 3D score. This GPU can handle the majority of recent games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	187% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Sub-optimal background CPU (11%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	Asrock H310M-G/M.2 (all builds)
Memory	12.9 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.7 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20180525
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 09 '19 at 14:42
Run Duration	123 Seconds
Run User	BGR-User
Background CPU	11%

Watch Gameplay: 1060-6GB + 9400F How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing above expectations (60^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-8400-$131 312,220 User benchmarks, average bench 82% CPUSocket, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 6 threads Base clock 2.8 GHz, turbo 3.8 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (100^th percentile)	91.7% Outstanding	Memory 95.3 1-Core 123 2-Core 246 88% 155 Pts	4-Core 479 8-Core 659 72% 569 Pts	64-Core 663 41% 663 Pts
Poor: 61% ↑ This bench: 91.7% Great: 89%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-6GB-$117 1,368,019 User benchmarks, average bench 56% Gigabyte(1458 371A) CLim: 1961 MHz, MLim: 2002 MHz, Ram: 6GB, Driver: 417.35 Performing way above expectations (95^th percentile)	60.3% Good	Lighting 74.5 Reflection 77.5 Parallax 66.7 61% 72.9 fps	MRender 71.7 Gravity 70.4 Splatting 74.6 59% 72.2 fps
Poor: 51% ↑ This bench: 60.3% Great: 60%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 970 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$92 154,949 User benchmarks, average bench 235% 173GB free (System drive) Firmware: 1B2QEXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s SusWrite @10s intervals: 559 304 312 319 321 319 MB/s Performing way below expectations (11^th percentile)	187% Outstanding	Read 1,280 Write 858 Mixed 813 SusWrite 356 184% 827 MB/s	4K Read 52.5 4K Write 121 4K Mixed 72.6 237% 82.1 MB/s	DQ Read 977 DQ Write 852 DQ Mixed 1,013 732% 947 MB/s
Poor: 160% ↑ This bench: 187% Great: 280%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37 3,105,054 User benchmarks, average bench 83% 205GB free Firmware: 02.01A02 SusWrite @10s intervals: 113 117 115 115 114 112 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	68.3% Good	Read 123 Write 112 Mixed 84.3 SusWrite 114 80% 108 MB/s	4K Read 1.1 4K Write 2.7 4K Mixed 1.2 229% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 52% ↑ This bench: 68.3% Great: 109%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Fury 2666 C16 2x8GB-$75 134,977 User benchmarks, average bench 82% 2 of 2 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2667 MHz Performing above expectations (76^th percentile)	87% Excellent	MC Read 34.2 MC Write 33.5 MC Mixed 24.7 88% 30.8 GB/s	SC Read 19 SC Write 31.9 SC Mixed 26.4 74% 25.8 GB/s	Latency 56.1 71% 56.1 ns
Poor: 65% ↑ This bench: 87% Great: 97%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical H310M-G/M.2 Builds (Compare 202 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 77%

Battleship

Desktop 85%

Aircraft carrier

Workstation 64%

Destroyer

Motherboard: Asrock H310M-G/M.2

CPU
Core i5-8400Intel $131Bench 82%, 312,220 samples	55x
Core i5-9400FIntel $102Bench 85%, 299,482 samples	48x
Core i3-8100Intel $110Bench 71%, 81,392 samples	33x

GPU
RTX 2060Nvidia $324Bench 90%, 645,160 samples	26x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	23x
GTX 1070-TiNvidia $299Bench 94%, 412,133 samples	22x

SSD
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	9x
ASE8TNVME256 256GBBench 78%, 331 samples	9x
A400 120GBKingston $29Bench 61%, 166,392 samples	8x

RAM
Fury 2666 C16 2x8GBHyperX $75Bench 82%, 134,977 samples	13x
2x8GBUnknownBench 64%, 236,291 samples	10x
HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GBKingstonBench 76%, 122,822 samples	9x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 75% - Very good

Total price: $557

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177	Nvidia RTX 4070 $539	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16