Asus P8H77-I

Performance Results


Gaming 79% Battleship	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 60% Destroyer


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing below expectations (39th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 61 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 77.2%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics	103% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive	41.8% is a reasonable SSD score. This drive enables fast boots and responsive applications.
Memory	8GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's sufficient for the vast majority of games. 8GB is also enough for moderate file and system caches which result in a very responsive system.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago.

Motherboard	Asus P8H77-I (all builds)
Memory	4.5 GB free of 8 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display	5760 x 1080 - 32 Bit couleurs
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20121015
Uptime	1.8 Days
Run Date	Mar 09 '19 at 11:44
Run Duration	294 Seconds
Run User	FRA-User
Background CPU	4%

Watch Gameplay: 2070 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing below expectations (39^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i5-3570K-$136 185,516 User benchmarks, average bench 68% LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads Base clock 3.4 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (93^rd percentile)	77.2% Very good	Memory 90.1 1-Core 100 2-Core 199 75% 130 Pts	4-Core 374 8-Core 363 50% 369 Pts	64-Core 387 24% 387 Pts
Poor: 54% ↑ This bench: 77.2% Great: 79%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200 478,117 User benchmarks, average bench 104% Zotac(19DA 2516) CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35 Performing below potential (52^nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide	103% Outstanding	Lighting 128 Reflection 123 Parallax 140 104% 130 fps	MRender 172 Gravity 121 Splatting 99.7 103% 131 fps
Poor: 93% ↑ This bench: 103% Great: 112%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
OCZ Agility 3 120GB-$102 38,562 User benchmarks, average bench 49% 20GB free (System drive) Firmware: 2.22 SusWrite @10s intervals: 108 100 102 102 101 104 MB/s Performing below expectations (28^th percentile)	41.8% Average	Read 135 Write 137 Mixed 132 SusWrite 103 29% 127 MB/s	4K Read 18.6 4K Write 57 4K Mixed 22.9 88% 32.8 MB/s	DQ Read 20.6 DQ Write 122 DQ Mixed 26.2 33% 56.2 MB/s
Poor: 31% ↑ This bench: 41.8% Great: 61%
WD VelociRaptor 250GB-$35 3,015 User benchmarks, average bench 90% 35GB free Firmware: 04.06A00 SusWrite @10s intervals: 169 172 172 173 173 173 MB/s Performing above expectations (63^rd percentile)	95.1% Outstanding	Read 159 Write 146 Mixed 91 SusWrite 172 104% 142 MB/s	4K Read 1.8 4K Write 2.5 4K Mixed 1.5 288% 1.93 MB/s
Poor: 62% ↑ This bench: 95.1% Great: 111%
Samsung M3 Portable 1TB 6,502 User benchmarks, average bench 38% 1GB free Firmware: 1306 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 32 Write 24.2 Mixed 24.5 20% 26.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.1 4K Mixed 0.5 88% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 15% Great: 59%
Seagate M3 Portable 1TB 5,295 User benchmarks, average bench 41% 1GB free Firmware: 9300 Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 29 Write 29.3 Mixed 26.5 21% 28.3 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 3.1 4K Mixed 0.4 118% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 16% Great: 65%
Samsung G3 Station 1.5TB 635 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 42GB free, PID 6013 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 41 41 42 41 42 42 MB/s Performing as expected (52^nd percentile)	17.3% Very poor	Read 27 Write 17.2 Mixed 25.5 SusWrite 41.4 38% 27.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.3 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.4 62% 0.7 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 17.3% Great: 20%
Samsung M3 Portable 500GB 4,300 User benchmarks, average bench 26% 50GB free, PID 61b3 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (12^th percentile)	13.6% Very poor	Read 31.8 Write 26.7 Mixed 25.7 SusWrite 13.8 32% 24.5 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.9 4K Mixed 0.8 94% 1.07 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.6% Great: 42%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 1GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed Relative performance n/a - sequential test incomplete		Read 30.2 Write 26.7 Mixed 19.3 31% 25.4 MB/s	4K Read 0.2 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.3 59% 0.63 MB/s
Poor: 13% Great: 44%
Hitachi HTS545050B9A300 500GB 44 User benchmarks, average bench 15% 3GB free, PID 70f5 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 21 19 19 19 19 19 MB/s Performing as expected (43^rd percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 37.7 Write 38.3 Mixed 28.7 SusWrite 19.4 41% 31 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.3 4K Mixed 0.7 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 5% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 19%
Samsung S2 Portable 500GB 2,689 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 4GB free, PID 1f05 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 18 18 18 18 18 20 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	13.8% Very poor	Read 37 Write 21.8 Mixed 27 SusWrite 18.3 33% 26 MB/s	4K Read 0.4 4K Write 1.4 4K Mixed 0.6 70% 0.8 MB/s
Poor: 11% ↑ This bench: 13.8% Great: 21%
Samsung M2 Portable 1TB 371 User benchmarks, average bench 17% 6GB free, PID 60b6 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing below expectations (21^st percentile)	12.7% Very poor	Read 30 Write 26.5 Mixed 24.7 SusWrite 13.9 31% 23.8 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.7 4K Mixed 0.8 87% 1 MB/s
Poor: 9% ↑ This bench: 12.7% Great: 21%
TOSHIBA External USB 3.0 1TB 15,101 User benchmarks, average bench 31% 5GB free, PID a200 Operating at USB 2.1 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 14 14 14 14 14 14 MB/s Performing way below expectations (6^th percentile)	13.1% Very poor	Read 30.7 Write 26.7 Mixed 20.2 SusWrite 13.8 30% 22.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.5 4K Write 1.8 4K Mixed 0.6 84% 0.97 MB/s
Poor: 13% ↑ This bench: 13.1% Great: 44%
TOSHIBA HDWA120 2TB 41GB free, PID 2338 Operating at USB 2.0 Speed SusWrite @10s intervals: 28 27 28 28 26 28 MB/s Relative performance n/a - insufficient samples	12.5% Very poor	Read 32.8 Write 28.5 Mixed 26.7 SusWrite 27.5 39% 28.9 MB/s	4K Read 0.9 4K Write 0.5 4K Mixed 0.3 30% 0.57 MB/s

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
HyperX Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GB 78,181 User benchmarks, average bench 51% 2 of 2 slots used 8GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz Performing below potential (37^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	49.5% Average	MC Read 17.3 MC Write 17.6 MC Mixed 16.1 49% 17 GB/s	SC Read 12 SC Write 16.2 SC Mixed 14.3 40% 14.2 GB/s	Latency 67.1 60% 67.1 ns
Poor: 30% ↑ This bench: 49.5% Great: 62%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical P8H77-I Builds (Compare 264 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 8%

Tree trunk

Desktop 64%

Destroyer

Workstation 7%

Tree trunk

Motherboard: Asus P8H77-I

CPU
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples	39x
Core i7-3770KIntel $175Bench 72%, 165,979 samples	34x
Core i5-3570KIntel $136Bench 68%, 185,516 samples	31x

GPU
HD 4000 (Desktop 1.15 GHz)Intel $15Bench 3%, 52,547 samples	25x
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples	16x
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples	15x

SSD
860 Evo 500GBSamsung $80Bench 105%, 762,998 samples	9x
M4 128GBCrucial $116Bench 60%, 34,516 samples	8x
MX500 500GBCrucial $46Bench 106%, 237,241 samples	6x

RAM
Vengeance DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBCorsairBench 48%, 73,650 samples	14x
Fury DDR3 1866 C10 2x8GBHyperXBench 59%, 122,541 samples	12x
Savage DDR3 1600 C9 2x4GBHyperXBench 51%, 78,181 samples	12x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 59% - Above average

Total price: $392

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $279	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $182	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $30	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16