Asrock X370 Killer SLI

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 78%
Battleship
Desktop
Desktop 92%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 73%
Battleship
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing above expectations (72nd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 28 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 87.1%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics82.1% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels.
Boot Drive61.3% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)
MotherboardAsrock X370 Killer SLI  (all builds)
Memory13.3 GB free of 16 GB @ 3 GHz
Display1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180704
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 09 '19 at 01:57
Run Duration157 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU1%
Watch Gameplay: 1080 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
AMD Ryzen 5 1600X-$125
AM4, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 4.05 GHz, turbo 4.05 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (100th percentile)
87.1% Excellent
Memory 80.8
1-Core 125
2-Core 250
84% 152 Pts
4-Core 501
8-Core 844
82% 672 Pts
64-Core 1,033
64% 1,033 Pts
Poor: 62%
This bench: 87.1%
Great: 82%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1080-$400
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 2642 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
82.1% Excellent
Lighting 87.9
Reflection 156
Parallax 132
72% 125 fps
MRender 121
Gravity 141
Splatting 116
102% 126 fps
Poor: 93%
This bench: 82.1%
Great: 110%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Q-180 180GB
110GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 1.72.00
SusWrite @10s intervals: 183 62 65 22 24 65 MB/s
Performing below potential (45th percentile) - Ensure that this drive is connected to a SATA 3.0 port with a SATA 3.0 cable
61.3% Good
Read 225
Write 112
Mixed 230
SusWrite 70.3
36% 159 MB/s
4K Read 29.2
4K Write 81.9
4K Mixed 27.9
123% 46.3 MB/s
DQ Read 203
DQ Write 286
DQ Mixed 144
137% 211 MB/s
Poor: 34%
This bench: 61.3%
Great: 90%
Corsair Force NVMe PCIe M.2 480GB
447GB free
Firmware: ECFM12.1 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 1983 939 591 592 593 601 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (90th percentile)
245% Outstanding
Read 1,933
Write 1,632
Mixed 1,492
SusWrite 883
332% 1,485 MB/s
4K Read 49.3
4K Write 124
4K Mixed 59.2
216% 77.6 MB/s
DQ Read 1,092
DQ Write 1,025
DQ Mixed 1,069
799% 1,062 MB/s
Poor: 125%
This bench: 245%
Great: 262%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
671GB free
Firmware: 02.01A02
SusWrite @10s intervals: 167 166 167 167 167 166 MB/s
Performing above expectations (80th percentile)
98.5% Outstanding
Read 176
Write 162
Mixed 107
SusWrite 167
112% 153 MB/s
4K Read 1.5
4K Write 2.5
4K Mixed 1.2
242% 1.73 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 98.5%
Great: 109%
SanDisk Ultra Fit USB 3.0 64GB-$23
57GB free, PID 5583
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 24 20 19 19 19 13 MB/s
Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
18.2% Very poor
Read 37.3
Write 18.8
Mixed 20.5
SusWrite 19
30% 23.9 MB/s
4K Read 6.5
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 1.8
164% 3.53 MB/s
Poor: 12%
This bench: 18.2%
Great: 39%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Corsair Vengeance RGB PRO DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB-$56
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 3000 MHz clocked @ 1500 MHz
Performing above expectations (84th percentile)
101% Outstanding
MC Read 41.2
MC Write 37.5
MC Mixed 32
105% 36.9 GB/s
SC Read 24.7
SC Write 35.2
SC Mixed 26.7
82% 28.9 GB/s
Latency 79.1
51% 79.1 ns
Poor: 62%
This bench: 101%
Great: 110%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical X370 Killer SLI Builds (Compare 404 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 61%
Destroyer
Desktop
Desktop 80%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 60%
Gunboat

Motherboard: Asrock X370 Killer SLI

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 112% - Outstanding Total price: $460
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $300Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $177Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $45SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback