| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (33rd percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 67 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 64.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 112% is an outstanding 3D score, it's the bee's knees. This GPU can handle almost all 3D games at very high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Memory | 32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
High background CPU (21%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme4 (all builds) |
| Memory | 27.6 GB free of 32 GB @ 0.7 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 10 |
| BIOS Date | 20130115 |
| Uptime | 0.1 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 09 '19 at 00:45 |
| Run Duration | 328 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 21% |
PC Performing below expectations (33rd percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
64.3%
Good
|
58% 92.7 Pts
|
39% 322 Pts
|
26% 423 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2080-Ti-$441
Gainward(10B0 1E07) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 11GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
112%
Outstanding
|
103% 169 fps
|
138% 176 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Crucial MX500 1TB-$66
816GB free
Firmware: M3CR023
SusWrite @10s intervals: 320 344 359 367 364 362 MB/s
|
86.7%
Excellent
|
81% 361 MB/s
|
126% 43.7 MB/s
|
153% 207 MB/s
|
|
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130
394GB free (System drive)
Firmware: RVT01B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 364 363 367 349 356 355 MB/s
|
||||
|
Crucial MX300 525GB-$150
489GB free
Firmware: M0CR060
SusWrite @10s intervals: 332 354 371 257 216 217 MB/s
|
75.4%
Very good
|
73% 324 MB/s
|
110% 40.5 MB/s
|
169% 225 MB/s
|
|
Intenso External USB 3.0 2TB
877GB free, PID 0579
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 91 90 91 91 90 91 MB/s
|
39.3%
Below average
|
108% 81.4 MB/s
|
87% 1 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance Pro DDR3 1600 C9 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 667 MHz clocked @ 800 MHz
Performing below potential (16th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
43.5%
Average
|
44% 15.5 GB/s
|
27% 9.53 GB/s
|
54% 73.6 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Extreme4 Builds (Compare 407 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme4 - $107
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 127x |
| FX-6300AMD $47Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 73x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 59x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 31x |
| GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples | 24x |
| GTX 960Nvidia $198Bench 33%, 440,282 samples | 21x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 62% - Good | Total price: $396 |