Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 38%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 98%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 35%
Jet ski
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (55th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 45 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith an outstanding single core score, this CPU is the cat's whiskers: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle typical workstation, and even moderate server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 96%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is excellent.
Graphics32.5% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive176% is an exceptional SSD score. This drive is suitable for heavy workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and allow for fast transfers of multi-gigabyte files.
Memory16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.
Run History
MotherboardAsus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)  (all builds)
Memory13.8 GB free of 16 GB @ 2.4 GHz
DisplayЦвета: 1920 x 1200 - 32 Bit
OSWindows 10
BIOS Date20180620
Uptime6.2 Days
Run DateMar 08 '19 at 19:21
Run Duration149 Seconds
Run User ISR-User
Background CPU5%
Watch Gameplay: 1050-Ti + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

 PC Performing as expected (55th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor BenchNormalHeavyServer
Intel Core i7-8700-$200
LGA1151, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads
Base clock 3.2 GHz, turbo 4.3 GHz (avg)
Performing way above expectations (99th percentile)
96% Outstanding
Memory 92.7
1-Core 137
2-Core 277
93% 169 Pts
4-Core 534
8-Core 862
86% 698 Pts
64-Core 1,065
66% 1,065 Pts
Poor: 75%
This bench: 96%
Great: 94%
Graphics Card Bench3D DX93D DX103D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1050-Ti-$59
Asus(1043 8611) ≥ 4GB
CLim: 1911 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 4GB, Driver: 398.11
Performing way above expectations (93rd percentile)
32.5% Below average
Lighting 40.6
Reflection 31
Parallax 37.9
33% 36.5 fps
MRender 38.7
Gravity 40.3
Splatting 36.3
31% 38.4 fps
Poor: 27%
This bench: 32.5%
Great: 33%
Drives BenchSequentialRandom 4kDeep queue 4k
Samsung 960 Evo NVMe PCIe M.2 250GB-$45
95GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 3B7QCXE7 Max speed: PCIe 16,000 MB/s
SusWrite @10s intervals: 599 290 291 288 287 285 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (18th percentile)
176% Outstanding
Read 1,075
Write 936
Mixed 520
SusWrite 340
160% 718 MB/s
4K Read 42.4
4K Write 131
4K Mixed 52.1
200% 75.3 MB/s
DQ Read 1175
DQ Write 1,126
DQ Mixed 656
628% 986 MB/s
Poor: 142%
This bench: 176%
Great: 236%
WD Blue 2TB (2015)-$84
39GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 80 80 80 82 80 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (10th percentile)
45.8% Average
Read 78.7
Write 69.2
Mixed 48.1
SusWrite 80.5
51% 69.1 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.3
4K Mixed 0.9
184% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 40%
This bench: 45.8%
Great: 84%
WD WD20EACS-11BHUB0 2TB
22GB free
Firmware: 51.0AB51
SusWrite @10s intervals: 60 66 68 68 69 68 MB/s
Performing way below expectations (4th percentile)
29.3% Poor
Read 35.8
Write 51.9
Mixed 15.2
SusWrite 66.3
31% 42.3 MB/s
4K Read 0.4
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
56% 0.33 MB/s
Poor: 30%
This bench: 29.3%
Great: 66%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$37
931GB free
Firmware: 80.00A80
SusWrite @10s intervals: 176 176 173 176 175 175 MB/s
Performing way above expectations (87th percentile)
102% Outstanding
Read 181
Write 153
Mixed 87
SusWrite 175
109% 149 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.7
164% 1.37 MB/s
Poor: 52%
This bench: 102%
Great: 109%
Memory Kit BenchMulti coreSingle coreLatency
Kingston HyperX 2400 C15 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR4 clocked @ 2400 MHz
Performing above expectations (72nd percentile)
79.5% Very good
MC Read 30.8
MC Write 30.3
MC Mixed 22.3
79% 27.8 GB/s
SC Read 19.1
SC Write 32.2
SC Mixed 24.5
72% 25.3 GB/s
Latency 62.7
64% 62.7 ns
Poor: 53%
This bench: 79.5%
Great: 90%

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Typical TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI) Builds (Compare 434 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
Gaming
Gaming 55%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 94%
Nuclear submarine
Workstation
Workstation 50%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus TUF H370-PRO GAMING (WI-FI)

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 108% - Outstanding Total price: $402
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273Nvidia RTX 4060 $295Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $133Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $178Nvidia RTX 4070 $539Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $39Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $37Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16
If you make a purchase via one of these links, our site may earn a commission
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback