Asus P8Z77-V LX

Performance Results

 
Gaming
Gaming 37%
Jet ski
Desktop
Desktop 68%
Battle cruiser
Workstation
Workstation 54%
Yacht
PC StatusOverall this PC is performing as expected (47th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 53 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
ProcessorWith a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Additionally this processor can handle very light workstation, and even some very light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 73.5%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is good.
Graphics33.1% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive66.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory32GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's far more than any current game requires. 32GB will also allow for large file and system caches, virtual machine hosting, software development, video editing and batch multimedia processing.
OS VersionAlthough Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 10 years and 11 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager.
Very high background CPU (44%). High background CPU reduces benchmark accuracy. How to reduce background CPU.
Run History
MotherboardAsus P8Z77-V LX  (all builds)
Memory12.7 GB free of 32 GB @ 1.3 GHz
Display3840 x 1200 - 32 Bit colors
OSWindows 7
BIOS Date20140721
Uptime0 Days
Run DateMar 08 '19 at 17:52
Run Duration180 Seconds
Run User GBR-User
Background CPU 44%

 PC Performing as expected (47th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor Bench Normal Heavy Server
Intel Core i7-3770-$220
LGA1155, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 8 threads
Base clock 3.4 GHz
Performing as expected (49th percentile)
73.5% Very good
Memory 89.4
1-Core 95.6
2-Core 152
70% 112 Pts
4-Core 312
8-Core 450
49% 381 Pts
64-Core 529
36% 529 Pts
Poor: 65%
This bench: 73.5%
Great: 83%
Graphics Card Bench 3D DX9 3D DX10 3D DX11
Nvidia GTX 1060-3GB-$170
CLim: 1999 MHz, MLim: 2102 MHz, Ram: 3GB, Driver: 419.35
Relative performance (0th percentile) - GPU OC Guide
33.1% Below average
Lighting 93.3
Reflection 99.7
Parallax 112
24% 102 fps
MRender 89.9
Gravity 122
Splatting 93.9
34% 102 fps
Poor: 49%
This bench: 33.1%
Great: 57%
Drives Bench Sequential Random 4k Deep queue 4k
Kingston SSDNow UV400 480GB-$138
115GB free (System drive)
Firmware: 0C3F
SusWrite @10s intervals: 260 285 230 135 86 74 MB/s
Performing below expectations (28th percentile)
66.2% Good
Read 479
Write 446
Mixed 326
SusWrite 178
80% 357 MB/s
4K Read 26.2
4K Write 70.1
4K Mixed 12.7
93% 36.3 MB/s
DQ Read 294
DQ Write 133
DQ Mixed 158
132% 195 MB/s
Poor: 50%
This bench: 66.2%
Great: 92%
WD Blue 3TB (2015)-$73
2TB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 149 151 151 152 146 152 MB/s
Performing above expectations (77th percentile)
84.7% Excellent
Read 145
Write 119
Mixed 84.1
SusWrite 150
91% 124 MB/s
4K Read 1
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.1
218% 1.67 MB/s
Poor: 48%
This bench: 84.7%
Great: 97%
WD Blue 1TB (2012)-$24
308GB free
Firmware: 01.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 141 141 141 142 140 141 MB/s
Performing above expectations (60th percentile)
88.4% Excellent
Read 167
Write 160
Mixed 79.5
SusWrite 141
100% 137 MB/s
4K Read 1.2
4K Write 2.9
4K Mixed 1.2
237% 1.77 MB/s
Poor: 54%
This bench: 88.4%
Great: 108%
WD Red 4TB (2013)-$110
829GB free
Firmware: 80.0
SusWrite @10s intervals: 117 117 117 117 116 117 MB/s
Performing below expectations (37th percentile)
69.4% Good
Read 125
Write 123
Mixed 78.3
SusWrite 117
81% 111 MB/s
4K Read 0.9
4K Write 2.4
4K Mixed 0.9
182% 1.4 MB/s
Poor: 45%
This bench: 69.4%
Great: 100%
Toshiba P300 3TB-$102
688GB free
Firmware: MX6O
SusWrite @10s intervals: 131 130 131 131 130 133 MB/s
Performing below expectations (21st percentile)
74.7% Very good
Read 129
Write 130
Mixed 15.5
SusWrite 131
73% 101 MB/s
4K Read 1.1
4K Write 2.2
4K Mixed 0.6
153% 1.3 MB/s
Poor: 56%
This bench: 74.7%
Great: 109%
Disk drive 1TB
809GB free, PID b001
Operating at USB 3.0 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 55 55 55 55 55 55 MB/s
Performing as expected (44th percentile)
22.3% Poor
Read 64
Write 65.5
Mixed 18.8
SusWrite 54.8
66% 50.8 MB/s
4K Read 0.5
4K Write 0.3
4K Mixed 0.3
22% 0.37 MB/s
Poor: 20%
This bench: 22.3%
Great: 37%
Memory Kit Bench Multi core Single core Latency
Corsair XMS3 DDR3 1600 C11 4x8GB
4 of 4 slots used
32GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing as expected (56th percentile)
49.7% Average
MC Read 17.9
MC Write 17.1
MC Mixed 15.3
48% 16.8 GB/s
SC Read 14.4
SC Write 16.4
SC Mixed 16.2
45% 15.7 GB/s
Latency 68
59% 68 ns
Poor: 39%
This bench: 49.7%
Great: 60%
Take a copy of your results

 System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds.

Typical P8Z77-V LX Builds (Compare 19,441 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings.
Gaming
Gaming 51%
Yacht
Desktop
Desktop 74%
Battleship
Workstation
Workstation 48%
Yacht

Motherboard: Asus P8Z77-V LX - $182

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER Value: 46% - Average Total price: $962
The Best.
CPUGPUSSD
Intel Core i5-9600K $195Nvidia GTX 1660S (Super) $230Crucial MX500 250GB $49
Intel Core i5-9400F $155Nvidia GTX 1650S (Super) $170Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $78
Intel Core i7-9700K $370Nvidia RTX 2070S (Super) $510Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $50
HDDRAMUSB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $36Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $76SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $24Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $75SanDisk Extreme 32GB $46
Seagate Barracuda 3TB (2016) $85G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $681SanDisk Extreme 16GB $24
Today's hottest deals
About  •  User Guide  •  FAQs  •  Email  •  Privacy  •  Developer  •  YouTube Feedback