| PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (29th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 71 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
| Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 66.9%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
| Graphics | 97.4% is a very good 3D score, it's the business. This GPU can handle recent 3D games at high resolutions and ultra detail levels. |
| Boot Drive | 81.2% is a very good SSD score. This drive is suitable for moderate workstation use, it will facilitate fast boots, responsive applications and ensure minimum IO wait times. |
| Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
| OS Version | Although Windows 7 is still a viable option, it's now 14 years and 8 months old. This system should be upgraded to Windows 10 which is generally faster and has an improved set of core utilities including better versions of explorer and task manager. |
| Motherboard | Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 (all builds) |
| Memory | 12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
| Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit Farben |
| OS | Windows 7 |
| BIOS Date | 20160531 |
| Uptime | 0 Days |
| Run Date | Mar 08 '19 at 12:53 |
| Run Duration | 128 Seconds |
| Run User | DEU-User |
| Background CPU | 3% |
PC Performing below expectations (29th percentile)
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
| Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
66.9%
Good
|
61% 100 Pts
|
42% 340 Pts
|
26% 426 Pts
|
| Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Nvidia RTX 2070-$200
CLim: 2100 MHz, MLim: 3500 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 419.35
Performing below potential (15th percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
97.4%
Outstanding
|
89% 128 fps
|
113% 143 fps
| |
| Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
71GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 330 315 135 134 134 134 MB/s
|
81.2%
Excellent
|
76% 341 MB/s
|
137% 46.9 MB/s
|
74% 145 MB/s
|
|
Seagate Barracuda 7200.12 1TB-$70
187GB free
Firmware: JC66
SusWrite @10s intervals: 81 81 82 82 82 82 MB/s
|
46.6%
Average
|
57% 77 MB/s
|
168% 1.03 MB/s
| |
| Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
|---|---|---|---|---|
|
Corsair Vengeance LP DDR3 1600 C10 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 1333 MHz clocked @ 667 MHz
Performing below potential (5th percentile) - Ensure that the top XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
27.7%
Poor
|
25% 8.63 GB/s
|
24% 8.43 GB/s
|
56% 71.1 ns
|
System Memory Latency Ladder
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
Typical 970 Extreme3 R2.0 Builds (Compare 463 builds)
See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings
|
|
|
Motherboard: Asrock 970 Extreme3 R2.0 - $300
| CPU |
|
|---|---|
| FX-8350AMD $130Bench 61%, 313,196 samples | 155x |
| FX-6300AMD $57Bench 55%, 261,607 samples | 110x |
| FX-8320AMD $129Bench 59%, 106,454 samples | 65x |
| GPU |
|
|---|---|
| GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 43x |
| RX 580AMD $130Bench 52%, 360,351 samples | 24x |
| GTX 1070Nvidia $132Bench 80%, 1,459,281 samples | 23x |
| EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 80% - Very good | Total price: $517 |