PC Status | Overall this PC is performing below expectations (21st percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 79 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components. Use the charts in the benchmark sections of this report to identify problem areas. |
Processor | With a good single core score, this CPU can easily handle the majority of general computing tasks. Despite its good single core score this processor isn't appropriate for workstation use due to its relatively weak multi-core performance. Finally, with a gaming score of 63.3%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is above average. |
Graphics | 23% is a below average 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle older games but it will struggle to render recent games at resolutions greater than 1080p. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics) |
Boot Drive | 68.6% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times. |
Memory | 16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing. |
OS Version | Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option. |
Motherboard | Gigabyte GA-B75M-D3H (all builds) |
Memory | 8.4 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.3 GHz |
Display | 1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors |
OS | Windows 10 |
BIOS Date | 20121026 |
Uptime | 3 Days |
Run Date | Mar 08 '19 at 04:47 |
Run Duration | 163 Seconds |
Run User | USA-User |
Background CPU | 44% |
Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).
Processor | Bench | Normal | Heavy | Server |
---|---|---|---|---|
Intel Core i5-3350P-$60
Intel(R) Core(TM) i5-3350P CPU @ 3.10GHz, 1 CPU, 4 cores, 4 threads
Base clock 3.3 GHz, turbo 3.3 GHz (avg)
|
63.3%
Good
|
|||
Graphics Card | Bench | 3D DX9 | 3D DX10 | 3D DX11 |
---|---|---|---|---|
Nvidia GTX 1050-$101
Gigabyte(1458 3765) 2GB
CLim: 1936 MHz, MLim: 1752 MHz, Ram: 2GB, Driver: 419.17
Performing below potential (2nd percentile) - GPU OC Guide |
23%
Poor
|
|||
Drives | Bench | Sequential | Random 4k | Deep queue 4k |
---|---|---|---|---|
Samsung 850 Evo 500GB-$109
407GB free (System drive)
Firmware: EMT02B6Q
SusWrite @10s intervals: 168 172 185 193 186 185 MB/s
|
68.6%
Good
|
|||
Seagate ST1000LM035-1RK172 1TB
192GB free
Firmware: SDM2
SusWrite @10s intervals: 73 76 82 82 82 80 MB/s
|
37.1%
Below average
|
|||
WD Blue 500GB (2008)-$29
61GB free
Firmware: 05.01D05
SusWrite @10s intervals: 82 84 83 85 84 85 MB/s
|
54.6%
Above average
|
|||
Samsung Flash Drive 32GB
26GB free, PID 1000
Operating at USB 2.1 Speed
SusWrite @10s intervals: 13 13 14 14 13 13 MB/s
|
10.1%
Very poor
|
|||
Memory Kit | Bench | Multi core | Single core | Latency |
---|---|---|---|---|
Corsair ValueSelect DDR3 1333 C9 2x8GB
2 of 4 slots used
16GB DIMM DDR3 clocked @ 1333 MHz
Performing below potential (3rd percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP |
24.4%
Poor
|
|||
L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds
|
|
|
CPU | |
---|---|
Core i7-3770Intel $297Bench 69%, 278,207 samples | 871x |
Core i5-3470Intel $59Bench 63%, 223,595 samples | 596x |
Core i5-3570IntelBench 65%, 104,858 samples | 355x |
GPU | |
---|---|
HD 2500 (Desktop 1.05 GHz)IntelBench 1%, 146,665 samples | 375x |
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples | 252x |
GTX 1060-6GBNvidia $117Bench 56%, 1,368,019 samples | 182x |
EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER | Value: 64% - Good | Total price: $405 |