EVGA 131-GT-E767

Performance Results


Gaming 42% Speed boat	Desktop 81% Aircraft carrier	Workstation 36% Jet ski


PC Status	Overall this PC is performing as expected (46th percentile). This means that out of 100 PCs with exactly the same components, 54 performed better. The overall PC percentile is the average of each of its individual components.
Processor	With a brilliant single core score, this CPU is the business: It demolishes everyday tasks such as web browsing, office apps and audio/video playback. Additionally this processor can handle light workstation, and even some light server workloads. Finally, with a gaming score of 81%, this CPU's suitability for 3D gaming is very good.
Graphics	50.4% is a reasonable 3D score (RTX 2060S = 100%). This GPU can handle the majority of recent games but it will struggle with resolutions greater than 1080p at ultra detail levels. (Note: general computing tasks don't require 3D graphics)
Boot Drive	70.2% is a good SSD score. This drive enables fast boots, responsive applications and ensures minimum system IO wait times.
Memory	16GB is enough RAM to run any version of Windows and it's more than sufficient for nearly all games. 16GB also allows for very large file and system caches, software development and batch photo editing/processing.
OS Version	Although Windows 10 is not the most recent version of Windows, it remains a great option.

Run History

5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 5 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago, 4 years ago. (Only the first run influences device rankings)

Motherboard	EVGA 131-GT-E767 (all builds)
Memory	12.5 GB free of 16 GB @ 1.1 GHz
Display	1920 x 1080 - 32 Bit colors
OS	Windows 10
BIOS Date	20110825
Uptime	0 Days
Run Date	Mar 08 '19 at 04:29
Run Duration	132 Seconds
Run User	USA-User
Background CPU	5%

Watch Gameplay: 570 + 9600K How to compare your gameplay

PC Performing as expected (46^th percentile)

Actual performance vs. expectations. The graphs show user score (x) vs user score frequency (y).

Processor	Bench	Normal	Heavy	Server
Intel Core i7 980-$148 2,215 User benchmarks, average bench 75% Socket 423, 1 CPU, 6 cores, 12 threads Base clock 3.5 GHz, turbo 3.6 GHz (avg) Performing way above expectations (89^th percentile)	81% Excellent	Memory 94.9 1-Core 91.5 2-Core 179 73% 122 Pts	4-Core 363 8-Core 533 56% 448 Pts	64-Core 666 41% 666 Pts
Poor: 66% ↑ This bench: 81% Great: 86%

Graphics Card	Bench	3D DX9	3D DX10	3D DX11
AMD RX 570-$130 473,685 User benchmarks, average bench 45% MSI(1462 341B) CLim: 1268 MHz, MLim: 1750 MHz, Ram: 8GB, Driver: 19.2.3 Performing way above expectations (99^th percentile)	50.4% Above average	Lighting 63.4 Reflection 65.2 Parallax 79.7 52% 69.4 fps	MRender 63.4 Gravity 61.3 Splatting 53.5 48% 59.4 fps
Poor: 37% ↑ This bench: 50.4% Great: 49%

Drives	Bench	Sequential	Random 4k	Deep queue 4k
Samsung 860 Evo 250GB-$52 296,814 User benchmarks, average bench 104% 199GB free (System drive) Firmware: RVT02B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 114 116 118 119 119 119 MB/s Performing way below expectations (3^rd percentile)	70.2% Very good	Read 363 Write 218 Mixed 263 SusWrite 117 54% 240 MB/s	4K Read 32.9 4K Write 49.4 4K Mixed 38.6 126% 40.3 MB/s	DQ Read 241 DQ Write 175 DQ Mixed 207 155% 207 MB/s
Poor: 75% ↑ This bench: 70.2% Great: 128%
Samsung 860 Evo 1TB-$130 602,853 User benchmarks, average bench 112% 690GB free Firmware: RVT01B6Q SusWrite @10s intervals: 118 121 120 120 119 120 MB/s Performing way below expectations (2^nd percentile)	69% Good	Read 364 Write 219 Mixed 265 SusWrite 120 54% 242 MB/s	4K Read 30.6 4K Write 50.4 4K Mixed 37.6 121% 39.5 MB/s	DQ Read 236 DQ Write 174 DQ Mixed 207 154% 205 MB/s
Poor: 81% ↑ This bench: 69% Great: 133%

Memory Kit	Bench	Multi core	Single core	Latency
Unknown 4x4GB 106,178 User benchmarks, average bench 43% 4 of 6 slots used 16GB DIMM DDR2 Performing below potential (38^th percentile) - ensure that a dual+ channel XMP BIOS profile is enabled: How to enable XMP	39.5% Below average	MC Read 15.1 MC Write 12.1 MC Mixed 12.7 38% 13.3 GB/s	SC Read 10.2 SC Write 7.1 SC Mixed 9.8 26% 9.03 GB/s	Latency 57.5 70% 57.5 ns
Poor: 23% ↑ This bench: 39.5% Great: 61%

Take a copy of your results

System Memory Latency Ladder

L1/L2/L3 CPU cache and main memory (DIMM) access latencies in nano seconds

Custom PC Builder (Explore upgrades for this PC) Build your perfect PC: compare component prices, popularity, speed and value for money

CHOOSE AN UPGRADE:

CPU

GPU

SSD

HDD

RAM

MBD

Typical 131-GT-E767 Builds (Compare 86 builds) See popular component choices, score breakdowns and rankings

Gaming 36%

Jet ski

Desktop 72%

Battleship

Workstation 29%

Raft

Motherboard: EVGA 131-GT-E767

CPU
Core i7-950Intel $100Bench 66%, 36,389 samples	37x
Core i7 960Intel $220Bench 68%, 16,233 samples	11x
Xeon X5670IntelBench 73%, 9,061 samples	6x

GPU
GTX 1060-3GBNvidia $119Bench 52%, 627,793 samples	7x
GTX 1050-TiNvidia $59Bench 29%, 946,701 samples	5x
GTX 970Nvidia $200Bench 49%, 834,238 samples	5x

SSD
520 Series 180GBIntel $140Bench 72%, 14,258 samples	6x
850 Evo 500GBSamsung $109Bench 112%, 695,664 samples	4x
A400 240GBKingston $28Bench 66%, 424,288 samples	4x

RAM
3x4GBUnknownBench 42%, 39,448 samples	24x
6x4GBUnknownBench 47%, 28,320 samples	12x
6x2GBUnknownBench 46%, 38,297 samples	10x

EDIT WITH CUSTOM PC BUILDER

Value: 61% - Good

Total price: $359

CPU	GPU	SSD
Intel Core i5-13600K $273	Nvidia RTX 4060 $300	Crucial MX500 250GB $40
Intel Core i5-12400F $132	Nvidia RTX 4060-Ti $385	Samsung 850 Evo 120GB $80
Intel Core i5-12600K $186	Nvidia RTX 4070 $409	Samsung 860 Evo 250GB $52

HDD	RAM	USB
Seagate Barracuda 1TB (2016) $34	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3200 C16 2x8GB $40	SanDisk Extreme 64GB $72
WD Blue 1TB (2012) $35	Corsair Vengeance LPX DDR4 3000 C15 2x8GB $43	SanDisk Extreme 32GB $28
Seagate Barracuda 2TB (2016) $51	G.SKILL Trident Z DDR4 3200 C14 4x16GB $351	SanDisk Ultra Fit 32GB $16